Preschool pilot program headed to Pence's desk

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lawmakers gave Gov. Mike Pence just a sliver of the expansive pre-kindergarten program he’d been seeking but assigned him significant responsibility in getting the state-funded classes going.

On the last day of the 2014 legislative session, the Republican-controlled House and Senate approved a compromise bill that creates a five-county pilot preschool program.

The bill authorizes Pence to spend up to $10 million to launch classes as early as this fall. But he must find savings within the Family and Social Service Administration to pay for it. And FSSA and the participating preschool programs must use grants or private donations to fund at least 10 percent of preschool costs.

The bill’s author, Rep. Bob Behning, R-Indianapolis, said the plan encourages only high-quality programs with academic rigor and that parents must participate.

“We’ll make sure that any parent that enrolls their child understands this is not just a day care program but this is an early-childhood education program,” Behning said. “We do have an attendance (requirement) so we make certain they attend on a regular basis.”

The House approved the bill 92-8 and the Senate passed it 40-8. It includes a study that will follow participating students through the third grade and explore additional ways to pay for a statewide program.

Pence had originally sought state-funded pre-kindergarten for all low-income children in Indiana. But lawmakers were concerned about the cost – and some GOP senators questioned whether preschool is effective.

In the last few weeks, the governor has been traveling the state visiting pre-K programs to try to win support for his plan. On Thursday, Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said the compromise measure “puts the burden on Pence” to show that preschool works.

“I think the governor’s rather ambitious initial request seemed to be pretty overarching in terms of the people it covered,” Kenley said. The compromise legislation better hones the program so it serves only the poorest children and creates a study to determine whether the program helps the students achieve, he said.

To qualify, a student’s family could earn no more than 127 percent of the federal poverty limit. That’s about $28,380 for a family of four.

Democratic Sen. Earline Rogers of Gary, a former teacher and principal, called the pilot program “a step” toward statewide preschool. And she said it at least takes Indiana off the list of schools that don’t provide any state funding for preschool.

“We can now join Mississippi in a pre-K program,” she said.

Sen. Scott Schneider, R-Indianapolis, also said it will be a first step – but one that will lead to a larger program that’s too expensive.

“It’s the camel’s nose under the tent,” Schneider said. “This is a dangerous precedent.”

But Sen. Randy Head, R-Logansport, said the bill is limited and the pilot will expire unless the General Assembly votes to keep it in place.

“We’ll take a look at this longitudinal study, and if the program doesn’t work,” the legislature can end it, he said. “I don’t think the camel is going to get to far if the program doesn’t work.”

House Republicans had originally pushed to allow preschool participants to move directly into the state’s’ K-12 voucher program, without requiring them to try public schools first. But the final legislation doesn’t include that language.

The bill allows the pre-K program to launch as soon as this fall. But Claire Fiddian-Green, the governor’s special assistant for education innovation, said it’s likely the program would launch in 2015.

She said Pence is “grateful there is a well-thought-through pilot in place that could get up and running as soon as possible.”

The FSSA will be responsible for choosing the five counties for the pilot program.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Why not take some time to do some research before traveling to that Indiana town or city, and find the ones that are no smoking either inside, or have a patio? People like yourself are just being selfish, and unnecessarily trying to take away all indoor venues that smokers can enjoy themselves at. Last time I checked, it is still a free country, and businesses do respond to market pressure and will ban smoking, if there's enough demand by customers for it(i.e. Linebacker Lounge in South Bend, and Rack and Helen's in New Haven, IN, outside of Fort Wayne). Indiana law already unnecessarily forced restaurants with a bar area to be no smoking, so why not support those restaurants that were forced to ban smoking against their will? Also, I'm always surprised at the number of bars that chose to ban smoking on their own, in non-ban parts of Indiana I'll sometimes travel into. Whiting, IN(just southeast of Chicago) has at least a few bars that went no smoking on their own accord, and despite no selfish government ban forcing those bars to make that move against their will! I'd much rather have a balance of both smoking and non-smoking bars, rather than a complete bar smoking ban that'll only force more bars to close their doors. And besides IMO, there are much worser things to worry about, than cigarette smoke inside a bar. If you feel a bar is too smoky, then simply walk out and take your business to a different bar!

  2. As other states are realizing the harm in jailing offenders of marijuana...Indiana steps backwards into the script of Reefer Madness. Well...you guys voted for your Gov...up to you to vote him out. Signed, Citizen of Florida...the next state to have medical marijuana.

  3. It's empowering for this niche community to know that they have an advocate on their side in case things go awry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrst9VXVKfE

  4. Apparently the settlement over Angie's List "bundling" charges hasn't stopped the practice! My membership is up for renewal, and I'm on my third email trying to get a "basic" membership rather than the "bundled" version they're trying to charge me for. Frustrating!!

  5. Well....as a vendor to both of these builders I guess I have the right to comment. Davis closed his doors with integrity.He paid me every penny he owed me. Estridge,STILL owes me thousands and thousands of dollars. The last few years of my life have been spent working 2 jobs, paying off the suppliers I used to work on Estridge jobs and just struggling to survive. Shame on you Paul...and shame on you IBJ! Maybe you should have contacted the hundreds of vendors that Paul stiffed. I'm sure your "rises from the ashes" spin on reporting would have contained true stories of real people who have struggled to find work and pay of their debts (something that Paul didn't even attempt to do).