IBJNews

Private firm with Medicaid deal gets state help

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indiana company under fire for its handling of Missouri Medicaid patients is receiving help from the state in the form of a cadre of taxpayer-paid temporary workers and state employees, even as it faces the possibility of losing its lucrative state contract, lawmakers were told Wednesday.

Two officials with the state Department of Health and Senior Services told a House committee that the agency hired 13 temporary workers and shifted as many as 20 state workers from their regular jobs as the withering consumer complaints against SynCare LLC pile up.

The Indianapolis-based company won a contract in February worth as much as $5.5 million a year to determine whether thousands of Missouri Medicaid recipients qualify for home-based medical services or help with daily chores. The company has received $1.3 million since the contract took effect in mid-May, quickly followed by a litany of concerns, from inordinately long telephone wait times to sharp reductions in the number of hours of allowable care. Others have described being ignored entirely.

SynCare CEO Stephane DeKemper acknowledged to The Associated Press that the company has fallen short of its standards, but said the state also shares some responsibility because it grossly underestimated the amount of work the company would be doing.

Summoned by legislators to address the complaints — and justify the decision to award the contract in the first place — deputy state health director Peter Lyskowski and a colleague said their agency is considering scrapping the deal with SynCare but doesn't want to further jeopardize the delivery of in-home services to eligible low-income residents, many of whom are seniors or have disabilities.

"We're not satisfied with the performance that SynCare has exhibited on a number of fronts," he told the Interim House Committee on Budget Transparency. "But it would be irresponsible of us to just point the finger at SynCare and leave a vacuum for the delivery of services that are needed. ... It's our responsibility to make sure the job gets done, with or without SynCare."

To that end, the health department hired the temporary workers and reassigned some state workers on Aug. 18 — days after SynCare reportedly fired dozens of employees at its newly-opened Missouri office in suburban St. Louis. The company is contractually committed to having 130 workers in the state, and announced plans to hire even more. But its latest employee roster listed 13 fewer workers than the state minimum, Lyskowski testified.

"I've never heard of that before," said Rep. John Cauthorn, R-Mexico. "If I'm a contractor going to build a road, I don't know that we send out the highway department or (the Missouri Department of Transportation) to help them. Either they do their job, or they're not."

Rep. Dave Schatz, R-Sullivan, was even more blunt.

"The department has failed here miserably," he said.

Committee members were also told that while SynCare is collecting just half of its maximum fees because of the service struggles, the agency has yet to invoke a $5,000 monthly penalty the company faces for not meeting certain obligations.

DeKemper said in a telephone interview that the state had told the company it could be expected to process 4,400 cases a month, but that it instead has been inundated with more than 1,000 calls daily, including from clients whose service needs haven't been updated in as long as five years as well as from potentially new clients. The state's estimate of 20 needed employees for its telephone call center was also off the mark, she said.

"There are problems on both sides," she said. "My company has been portrayed in the wrong light. ...Was the state prepared to launch this as well? I don't think they were fully prepared."

Missouri lawmakers approved the move to third-party Medicaid eligibility screenings in 2010, alarmed by skyrocketing costs in the federal-state health insurance program for the poor and disabled.

The state, which had previously allowed client assessments by the same organizations that ultimately provided home-care services, saw the number of people receiving home services increase by 15 percent, while annual costs grew by one-third. Lawmakers saw the third-party solution as not only a money-saving alternative but also an approach that would eliminate potential conflicts of interest.

A consultant estimated Missouri could save $3.4 million annually by using an outside group to determine eligibility, which involves verifying patients' income and health conditions.

Committee chairman Ryan Silvey, a Kansas City Republican, noted that officials with the Office of Administration, which oversees state contracts, flagged SynCare's bid for its apparent "lack of understanding about the process."

The company had no prior experience with Medicaid eligibility screenings, dealing primarily with prenatal and diabetic patients in Indiana. But neither did any of the other 10 bidders, an Office of Administration representative said.

SynCare is a certified minority enterprise that helps evaluate and coach Medicaid patients at high risk for hospitalization—those with multiple chronic diseases or high-risk pregnancies, for example.

Last June, SynCare withdrew a request for a property tax abatement from the Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission tied to the creation of 114 jobs, citing "changing market conditions." At the time, the firm had 31 employees.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Private firm-medicaid
    Another colossal mistake...
    Handing out millions and no accountability.
    No wonder Governments are having financial
    problems.
    Anybody out there with some common sense...
  • Outsource Ripp OFf
    It's just another case of Out-Source Ripoff, Any foreign entity can register a business in Indiana rip off anyone they please and get away with it under Indiana law. Look how much money Mitch Daniels has funneled to foreign companies that have have done nothing!

    This is what happens when you let Republicans are in charge!
  • What?
    How do you "coach" medicaid recipients at risk for hospitalization? I feel this article doesn't explain the problem adequately.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Now if he'd just stay there...

  2. Daniel - what about the many US citizens who do NOT follow what the Bible teaches? The Hindus, Jews, Muslims and others who are all American citizens entitled to all rights as Americans?? This issue has NOTHING to do with "What the Bible says..." Keep all Churches separate from State! Pence's ongoing idiocy continues to make Indiana look like a backwards, homophobic state in the eyes of our nation. Can't we move on to bigger issues - like educating our kids?

  3. 1. IBJ should link to the referenced report. We are in the age of electronic media...not sharing information is lazy. Here is a link http://www.in.gov/gov/files/Blue_Ribbon_Panel_Report_July_9_2014.pdf 2. The article should provide more clarity about the make-up of this panel. The commenters are making this item out to be partisan, it does not appear the panel is partisan. Here is a list of the panel which appears to be balanced with different SME to add different perspectives http://www.in.gov/activecalendar/EventList.aspx?view=EventDetails&eventidn=138116?formation_id=189603 3. It suggests a by-pass, I do not see where this report suggests another "loop". 4. Henry, based on your kneejerk reaction, we would be better off if you moved to another state unless your post was meant as sarcasm in which case I say Well Done. 5. The article and report actually indicates need to improve rail and port infrastructure in direct contradiction to Shayla commentary. Specifically, recommendation is to consider passenger rail projects... 6. People have a voice with their elected officials. These are suggestions and do not represent "crony capitalism", etc. The report needs to be analyzed and the legislature can decide on priorities and spending. Don't like it, then vote in a new legislature but quit artificially creating issues where there are none! People need to sift through the politics and provide constructive criticism to the process rather than making uninformed comments in a public forum based on misinformation. IBJ should work harder to correct the record in these forums when blatant errors or misrepresentations are made.

  4. Joe ... Marriage is defined in the Bible ... it is mentioned in the Bible often. Marriage is not mentioned once in the US or Indiana Constitution ...

  5. Daniel - Educate me please: what does the Bible have to do with laws? If the government wasn't in the business of marriage to begin with, then it wouldn't have to "define" marriage at all. Marriage could be left as a personal, religious, or otherwise unregulated action, with no ties to taxes, legal status, etc. Then people could marry whomever they want, and all this silliness would go away. Remember to vote Libertarian in November.

ADVERTISEMENT