IBJNews

SynCare withdraws abatement request

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Locally based SynCare LLC has withdrawn a request for a property tax abatement tied to the creation of 114 jobs, citing "changing market conditions."

The Metropolitan Development Commission had been scheduled to vote on the five-year abatement at its Wednesday meeting, but a SynCare official asked to pull the request, said John Bartholomew, a spokesman for the Department of Metropolitan Development.

MDC staff members had recommended approval; the request still could be re-filed at a later date.

SynCare owner Stephanie DeKemper told IBJ on Wednesday afternoon that she pulled the request to ensure the employment projections are accurate. She said federal health care reform legislation could have an impact on her business, including employment.

She said the application could be resubmitted as soon as August.

“These breaks for a small company like mine are very, very helpful, so we just wanted to make sure it’s right,” she said.

SynCare is a certified minority enterprise that helps evaluate and coach Medicaid patients at high risk for hospitalization—those with multiple chronic diseases or high-risk pregnancies, for example.

The company requested property tax abatement to offset a nearly $1 million investment in the purchase and installation of computer servers and other network equipment related to an office expansion.

SynCare is located on Purdue Road on the city’s northwest side. Besides its job-creation plans, SynCare said the abatement would help it retain 31 existing employees.

DeKemper purchased the 4-year-old SynCare in January from Dr. Steve Simpson, a pediatrician in Gary. A former police officer, DeKemper designed programs to fight substance abuse for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

She became interested in health disparities among minorities, leading her to help found the Indiana Minority Health Coalition and serve as its first executive director. She later became chief operating officer of Managed Health Services, a subsidiary of St. Louis-based Centene Corp.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT