Proposed wind farm seeking approval in Tipton

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An energy company that wants to build a massive wind farm in central Indiana has taken another step toward that goal.

The Kokomo Tribune reported this week that E.ON Climate & Renewables North America filed paperwork in Tipton seeking local plan commission approval of its Wildcat Wind Farm.

The company hopes to begin building 125 wind turbines in Tipton County by the end of the year. The complete project, which could cost up to $200 million to build, would span Grant, Howard, Madison and Tipton counties.

E-on, a European company with U.S. offices based in Chicago, plans to create 150 jobs during construction and four to six permanent full-time jobs when the wind farm is complete.

A public hearing on the company's request is scheduled for Aug. 22 at the Tipton County 4-H Fairgrounds community building.

In May, E.ON reached a 20-year agreement with Fort Wayne-based utility Indiana Michigan Power to sell it power from the proposed farm.

The 8,500-acre wind farm is expected to generate about 200 megawatts of electricity, enough to power about 60,000 homes. The utility said the project will be connected to American Electric Power's transmission system, which will deliver the power to customers in Indiana and Michigan.

About 75 of the farm's wind turbines would be located in Madison County if plans come to fruition.



  • reply
    I don't know of anyone (at least not anyone reasonbly intelligent and objective) that considers Wind a 100% solution to power generation. It is one of a variety of renewables that should be developed in parallel to help diversify the energy base away from its overwhelming reliance on fossil fules.
  • No Gain
    Power generated from wind turbines must be 100% backed up by conventional power sources unless you don't need electricity when the wind doesn't blow. This only drives up the cost of conventional power.
    • Good Project
      I like the wind farms between Lafayette and Chicago. Gives my kids something to do when we're driving to see Grandma. And many emerging technology's in this country were either created by or subsidized by govt money. Some succeed, some fail but I don't think those failures are a reason to quit attempting to advance technological development. IF we don't someone else will (China). Don't let perfection be the enemy of progress.
    • wonderful drive
      Actually I started enjoying more my ride from Indy to Chicago once they built the wind farm. It's more interesting to see than the corn fields (not that I don't like corn fields).
    • benefits?
      Ben so you would rather essentially ruin the land so that people can't use it. I have heard horror stories of ice chunks flying off the blades in the winter and crashing thru homes, and out West a number of endangered birds have had additional losses from contact with the blades. If you truely are interested in clean, cheap energy, than Nuclear is the only answer.
    • Good effects
      I'm a fan of these projects for a couple of reasons. First, it is a way to get some extra income into the hands of farmers (they are paid rent). This makes it far less likely that they will sell their land to be turned into suburbs. Also, few people want to live within a mile or two of these structures, so it prevents sprawl in that way too. Not to mention that once the subsidies for coal- and oil-based energy are ended, this source of energy will be cost-comparable. But best of all, the external costs of a wind farm are minimal, while the external costs of coal- and oil-based energy are extreme (hence their "low" cost).
    • Wrong use
      The issue isn't the system, but us. We demand so much energy that nothing can truly satisfy what we demand. We must focus on reduction in demand and then these projects will be feasible.

      By the way, we greatly subsidize coal and oil for energy so how is this different?
    • craziness
      The people who scream the environmentalist mantra are behind these eyesores. Just try driving from Lafayette to Chicago without feeling nauseous from the field of rotating blades. The real irony is that a majority in that particular network are NOT hooked into an electrical grid
    • Then what?
      The Feds are currently pumping billions into "renewables". Once this ends, these wind companies will go bankrupt...then what? This is nothing more than a short term scam by Chicago crooks to grab some tax money and run. Read up on Spain's foray into wind and solar, they ended up quitting because it was never going to be feasible without massive govt. subsidies!
    • wwwwwhhhhh
      I hear these will power tens of homes.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. to mention the rest of Molly's experience- she served as Communications Director for the Indianapolis Department of Public Works and also did communications for the state. She's incredibly qualified for this role and has a real love for Indianapolis and Indiana. Best of luck to her!

    2. Shall we not demand the same scrutiny for law schools, med schools, heaven forbid, business schools, etc.? How many law school grads are servers? How many business start ups fail and how many business grads get low paying jobs because there are so few high paying positions available? Why does our legislature continue to demean public schools and give taxpayer dollars to charters and private schools, ($171 million last year), rather than investing in our community schools? We are on a course of disaster regarding our public school attitudes unless we change our thinking in a short time.

    3. I agree with the other reader's comment about the chunky tomato soup. I found myself wanting a breadstick to dip into it. It tasted more like a marinara sauce; I couldn't eat it as a soup. In general, I liked the place... but doubt that I'll frequent it once the novelty wears off.

    4. The Indiana toll road used to have some of the cleanest bathrooms you could find on the road. After the lease they went downhill quickly. While not the grossest you'll see, they hover a bit below average. Am not sure if this is indicative of the entire deal or merely a portion of it. But the goals of anyone taking over the lease will always be at odds. The fewer repairs they make, the more money they earn since they have a virtual monopoly on travel from Cleveland to Chicago. So they only comply to satisfy the rules. It's hard to hand public works over to private enterprise. The incentives are misaligned. In true competition, you'd have multiple roads, each build by different companies motivated to make theirs more attractive. Working to attract customers is very different than working to maximize profit on people who have no choice but to choose your road. Of course, we all know two roads would be even more ridiculous.

    5. The State is in a perfect position. The consortium overpaid for leasing the toll road. Good for the State. The money they paid is being used across the State to upgrade roads and bridges and employ people at at time most of the country is scrambling to fund basic repairs. Good for the State. Indiana taxpayers are no longer subsidizing the toll roads to the tune of millions a year as we had for the last 20 years because the legislature did not have the guts to raise tolls. Good for the State. If the consortium fails, they either find another operator, acceptable to the State, to buy them out or the road gets turned back over to the State and we keep the Billions. Good for the State. Pat Bauer is no longer the Majority or Minority Leader of the House. Good for the State. Anyway you look at this, the State received billions of dollars for an assett the taxpayers were subsidizing, the State does not have to pay to maintain the road for 70 years. I am having trouble seeing the downside.