IBJNews

Public tours planned for Indianapolis catacombs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The mostly unknown catacombs dating to the 1880s underneath Indianapolis' City Market are expected to be opened for public tours in a few months.

The brick archways, limestone columns and cavernous walkways span 20,000 square feet underground and were part of Tomlinson Hall, a building along Market Street in downtown Indianapolis that burned in the 1950s.

It isn't clear now why the catacombs were built and few people know they exist, said Stevi Stoesz, City Market's executive director.

"If you've sat on the plaza at City Market to have lunch and listen to a band, you've been sitting on top of this hidden gem," Stoesz told WTHR-TV.

Over the years, the catacombs have been used for storage, a few special events and once, during a severe winter storm in 1912, to house the homeless.

Some have suggested turning the area into a wine cellar, nightclub or an underground park, but Stoesz said a 1990s study estimated it would cost more than $7 million to make the catacombs meet safety codes. That work would involve grading out the area's dirt floor, removing potential asbestos and adding an elevator.

"We suspect that number is in excess of $10 million today, just to get them up to code," Stoesz said.

Limited tours of the catacombs offered by City Market and Indiana Landmarks during the week leading up to the Super Bowl this winter were such a hit that organizers plan to start offering more in June.

"We would show pictures of what stood before, Tomlinson Hall, and give a tour of the market as well," Stoesz said. "It's so shrouded in mystery and when people do learn about it, they want to learn more."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT