Purdue receives $32 million Afghanistan farm grant

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A grant of $31.9 million awarded to Purdue University may translate into a more sustainable agricultural sector for Afghanistan, according to U.S. Sen. Dick Lugar.

Lugar, an Indiana Republican and ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, announced Monday that Purdue has received the five-year grant from the United States Agency for International Development. The grant will fund a project that trains the faculties of agricultural programs at five Afghan universities — including the University of Kabul, the University of Nangarhar, the University of Balkh, the University of Herat and the University of Kandahar.

"Rebuilding Afghanistan's agricultural economy remains one of the highest priorities for United States interests," Lugar said in a statement.

The grant will build off the work experts in the agricultural economics department's Afghan Faculty Exchange Program have undertaken in the war-torn central Asian country since 2006, when the school began bringing Afghan scholars to Indiana for graduate studies, according to program director Kevin McNamara. The program's main focus, McNamara said, is aiding Afghan faculty in maintaining and designing curriculum for agriculture-related disciplines like agronomy, the study of plant utilization in everyday life.

So far this year, the department's exchange program has one staff member on a long-term assignment training university faculty in Afghanistan, and it has continued to send three or four of its professors to teach management and methods seminars for a few weeks at a time, McNamara said. The program has accepted 12 junior university faculty members from Afghanistan as graduate students through a joint Purdue-USAID scholarship, along with 58 students who have completed graduate degrees in India on a USDA-backed scholarship.

According to McNamara, the new grant will bring 18 new master or doctoral candidates into the program.

McNamara has said a sound agricultural sector is crucial to economic growth in Afghanistan, where 85 percent of available work is in agriculture but many of the highly trained faculty fled the country after the Soviet invasion in the 1980s — leaving the country in critical need of agricultural know-how.

Purdue's program to cultivate faculty has been a key investment in human capital in Afghanistan since its inception, according to McNamara.

The Afghan higher education system, McNamara said, went through a 35-year slump in which people weren't getting good educations and the professors who came of age didn't have the knowledge or skill set their new counterparts have developed over the past few years.

"I think the greatest success (of the program) is giving opportunity to a lot of young Afghans who had very difficult lives up to their twenty or twenty-second birthday, giving them the opportunity to go to India and the U.S. and get master's degrees to demonstrate to themselves and others that they could be successful," McNamara. "And seeing them back at home trying to develop a system so others can have this opportunity ... so it's really this empowerment of young people to lead."

Purdue president France Cordova said in the statement that the grant goes along with the university's past collaborations with other institutions.

"This partnership extends our previous work in Afghanistan to help build the educational capacity required to improve agriculture and food systems and empower Afghan citizens to contribute to the country's development," Cordova said.


  • $32 million...Really????
    While our country is in a serious financial crisis, I'm disgusted that we can spend $32 million to help Afganistan's agriculture. Our goverment is running on a deficit budget and our own children are suffering from a lack of food, shelter and quality education in our country. Way to go.
  • Afghan Farming
    I thought the only things they grew in Afghanistan were opium poppies and marijuana. Sounds like the college kids are in for a good time.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.