RATHKE: My saga of staying up to date on health care reform

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Tracey RathkeTwenty years ago, when I took my job as director of human resources, I didn’t spend much of my working day worrying about politics. What went on in our nation’s capital had little impact on my daily tasks.

Now, with health care reform, I pay a lot of attention to Washington, D.C. In the last couple of years, I’ve spent more time watching votes, reading bills and checking for new “regs” than ever before. I’ve learned to use the word “grandfather” as a verb. And I’ve learned to sit in a holding pattern, waiting for Washington to settle on a course.

When I started, human resources could have been called employee services. I helped employees deal with payroll questions and benefit issues, often helping them decide which of the great, inexpensive benefits they should choose, and how to coordinate their various options.

Slowly, though, as health care costs climbed, and the impact on profits increased, CEOs and chief financial officers everywhere started asking, “What can we do to lower our health care costs?” Departments went into trimming mode, working to offset increasing costs without hitting employees too hard where they noticed it most: in their take-home pay.

Then along came health care reform, turning the world of employer-provided benefits upside down. Since the majority of Americans receive their health coverage from an employer, that’s a pretty big world to upset.

For me, at a firm with nearly 250 employees in Indianapolis, Chicago and St. Louis, nearly $2 million in insurance premiums, and a number of employees who own shares of the firm, a key issue was whether we would seek to maintain the bulk of our existing plan under the “grandfathering” provisions of health care reform.

Especially important was understanding how our nondiscrimination status might be affected by reform and any changes we would make to our plan. On this issue alone, I spent what seemed like hours huddled with consultants and read through reams of materials.

We ultimately decided against grandfathering, but quickly realized that was only a part of the issues we needed to address. To gather all the information I could on these and other reform issues, I spent days in reform seminars and workshops.

In the course of this process, we saw that not everything coming from reform is bad. For example, a lot of our employees, many of whom are established professionals, were pleased to see the addition of coverage for dependents to age 26.

It also gave us opportunity to talk with employees even more about high-deductible, health-savings-account-style plans. Anticipating that such plans would be coming in the future regardless of reform, we already had been tiptoeing in that direction.

Meanwhile, as I have wrestled with all these variables, I’ve also had to help employees prepare for reform by becoming better health care consumers. I know that, regardless of health care reform, the health care decision-making burden is shifting to employees—reform simply seems to have accelerated that shift.

As this evolution continues, we work to help employees see they will have greater responsibility for evaluating health care costs, shopping for the best prices, and paying attention to how much they spend and where they spend it. They’ll have to ask, “What’s better? More in the paycheck every other week, or more coverage if you get sick?”

In other words, in the new benefits world, they’ll have more freedom and more control over their costs, but they’ll have more responsibility for making their own decisions. That means an even bigger part of my job is to inform and educate employees and help their families meet their needs and solve their problems.

The most frustrating part of all this? It’s the fact that, even after all these months of studying, learning and plan-tweaking, thanks to the changeable nature of Washington politics, we really can’t be certain where reform is headed. We’re stuck in a holding pattern, with the real risk that, once it all becomes more defined, we can expect to spend hours and hours more on that same kind of process.

That means more time spent worrying about matters like slow-to-arrive regulations and the latest vote on Senate Bill Whatever. These days, it’s all part of the job for an HR professional.•


Rathke, SPHR (certified Senior Professional in Human Resources), is director of human resources for BSA LifeStructures in Indianapolis. Views expressed here are the writer’s.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....