Reagan's supply-side guru to address accountants in Indy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The man most despised by big-government, Keynesian disciples for arguing that lower taxes and lower government spending will spur economic growth is coming to Indianapolis next week, with a cautionary tale for the states.

Arthur Laffer, President Ronald Reagan’s go-to guy for supply-side economic theory, will address a national gathering of accountants held by Carmel-based newsletter “Inside Public Accounting,” Nov. 4-6 at the downtown Conrad Indianapolis.

Laffer, 73, is often called the father of supply-side economics. His Nov. 6 address will focus on contrasting tax and fiscal policies of California and Texas and their very different economic results.

He’s long produced research asserting states without personal income tax have markedly outperformed those with such taxes.

Texas has no personal income tax, while California has 10.3-percent income tax rate. Over a 10-year period ending in 2010, Texas trounced California in gross state product, personal income and employment growth. It also had more in-migration—people moving there from other parts of the country.

“You cannot tax your way into prosperity,” said Laffer, the founder and chairman of Nashville, Tenn.-based Laffer Associates, an institutional economic research and consulting firm.

Laffer and his economic theories have been rediscovered in the wake of arguably unsuccessful attempts by the Obama administration to reinvigorate the economy with rounds of stimulus programs and tax hikes.

Recently, in a column in the British conservative magazine The Spectator, Laffer said the more than $3 trillion in government spending aimed at reviving the economy after the 2008 financial crisis was “an abject failure.” He has argued that Washington policies have little to show as far as improving employment or economic growth, and in fact prolonged the recovery.

“The last few years have delivered a powerful refutation of Keynesian economics, because the American economy has performed better in an era of downsizing government that it did during the wild spending ride of 2008-11,” he told The Spectator.

Indiana is one of those states with a personal income tax, although it probably is “the least offensive,” when it comes to rates and deleterious effects, said Laffer, a friend of former Gov. Mitch Daniels.

He contrasts Indiana’s economy to that of Michigan, “a tragedy on wheels,” whose auto industry challenges were made worse by high tax rates and government policies, he said.

“You have a very bright future in Indiana," he said.

Laffer’s appearance is to give accounting firms more perspective on how to help their clients deal with fiscal and tax policy, said Michael Platt, principal of Carmel-based The Platt Group, which publishes Inside Public Accounting.

Accounting firms themselves are dealing with challenges ranging from retirements of experienced accountants to pressures to merge to gain the heft to service more and larger clients.

Inside Public Accounting also conducts a national benchmarking report and recognizes firms that have excelled in the industry. Among those to be honored at this year’s symposium is locally based Katz Sapper & Miller.

The symposium is expected to draw a number of guests from Top 100 accounting firms.


  • Re: Reagan
    I truly believe that the state of Indiana has been smart with the use of its money. Under Reagan's term our federal economy grew, so why not add the same tactic to the Accountants in Indianapolis. Right now many accountants are facing challenges from the retirements to the merging of firms. I like the idea of trying to use supply-side economics in the workplace.
  • State performance?
    Since Laffer just likes to throw up some numbers without analysis, wonder if he would accept the numbers on Texas ranging from the number of uninsured, to infant mortality, to crime, to average wages and income inequality?
  • What's that humming sound?
    Yes the economy was humming during Reagan's second term - at least for those selling arms to Iran.
  • And
    Yes. This is from a press release. Critical thinking, "kiddies."
  • Really?
    How is "borrow and spend" a la Bush working out for ya, guys? Laffer's theories have had 40 years of real-world trial. They. don't. work. There's an interesting cadre of folks - like Laffer, Bill Bennett, Bill Kristol, Peggy Noonan - who still have careers because they once shared a room with an inexplicably popular President (who did raise taxes and did support amnesty). So, go see him in the same way you'd go see Three Dog Night or Jan and Dean. Nostalgia for an age that didn't really happen the way you all "remember"...
  • ?
    I have failed to take anything away from this article.
  • Obamanomics
    How is that Obama economy and health care working out for you? Economy was humming in Reagan's second term, kiddies.
    • Lefty whiners
      Go light a candle to your Savior Obama, you name calling half-wit Commie
    • Beware
      Tax and spend clowns posted below.
    • Typical
      Typical comments from the peanut gallery. As usual with liberals, if you can't argue with facts, throw mud.
    • And, to Chris
      Journalists typically write their own articles. This is right from the Laffer PR department.
      • Conrad?
        This is being held at the Conrad? Crackers on South Meridian would be a more appropriate venue...
      • I'll go
        I like comedy.

      Post a comment to this story

      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

      2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

      3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

      4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

      5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.