IBJNews

Report: Simon may drop General Growth bid

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Shares in General Growth Properties Inc., the second-biggest U.S. mall owner, fell as much as 6.7 percent in New York trading Monday morning after a newsletter report that Simon Property Group Inc. may abandon a takeover bid for its smaller rival.

Indianapolis-based Simon is unlikely to move ahead with its buyout offer because of antitrust concerns, the REIT Newshound reported Sunday night, citing sources it didn’t identify. Simon has concluded that an attorney for Chicago-based General Growth who handles antitrust issues wasn’t dealing in “good faith,” the newsletter said, citing one of the sources.

Simon spokesman Les Morris and General Growth spokesman David Keating didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

General Growth fell 4.1 percent to $16.05 as of 11:49 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading, and sank to as low as $15.61 earlier MOnday. The shares have jumped 71 percent since Feb. 15, the day before Simon made public a $10 billion offer to buy the company out of bankruptcy. General Growth dismissed the bid as too low and instead plans to exit bankruptcy with financing from a group led by Brookfield Asset Management Inc.

“GGP shares were priced based on some sort of topping from Simon,” said Benjamin Yang, an analyst with Keefe, Bruyette & Woods in San Francisco. “Based on this news, it seems less likely that Simon will come back with an offer higher than the $15-a-share proposal from Brookfield.”

General Growth filed the biggest real estate bankruptcy in U.S. history almost a year ago after amassing $27 billion in debt making acquisitions. Simon’s bid would have given equity investors about $9 a share and paid unsecured creditors in full.

Simon has been preparing a new offer for General Growth, a person with knowledge of the plan told Bloomberg News last month.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT