Rolls-Royce late with key part for F-35 fighter

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc was an average of 160 days late last year in delivering equipment needed for the U.S. Marine Corps version of the F-35 fighter to hover and land like a helicopter, according to the Pentagon.

The delays for “lift fans” installed on the F-35B, the most complex model of the Joint Strike Fighter made by Lockheed Martin Corp., stemmed from flaws in parts provided by subcontractors, the Defense Contract Management Agency said in an e-mailed statement.

The lift fans are assembled at a Rolls-Royce facility outside of Indianapolis.

“There have been issues such as corrosion on some of the gears and some undersized holes,” Jacqueline Noble, a spokeswoman for the defense agency, said in the statement. While London-based Rolls-Royce and its subcontractors have made progress, the need to fix fan parts that don’t meet specifications “is still a concern,” she said.

The estimated cost for a fleet of 2,443 F-35 fighters has climbed to $395.7 billion, a 70-percent increase since 2001. The F-35B, the model designed for the Marines and for purchase by countries including the United Kingdom and Italy, has been the most trouble-plagued version of the jet, which is being produced even as it’s still in development.

The F-35B is designed for short takeoffs and landings on carriers and amphibious-warfare vessels. The Marine Corps plans to buy about 340 of the fighters.

Rolls-Royce, Europe’s largest maker of commercial aircraft engines, provides major components for the F-35B’s propulsion system to United Technologies Corp.’s Pratt and Whitney unit. Pentagon pressure on both companies to improve deliveries and subcontractor quality may increase in advance of planned funding increases after 2015.

Spending increase

Navy spending on engines for its carrier-based version of the F-35 and for the Marine Corps model is estimated to increase to $1.4 billion by fiscal 2018 from $519 million this fiscal year, according to internal Pentagon budget data.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates put the F-35B on “probation” in January 2011 until it could demonstrate greater reliability for the propulsion system’s driveshaft, clutch and auxiliary air-inlet door used in hovering. His successor, Leon Panetta, lifted the probation a year later, citing progress in finding solutions.

The co-chairmen of President Barack Obama’s deficit-reduction panel, former White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles and former Sen. Alan Simpson, suggested in 2010 that the F-35B be canceled. Dropping that version would save $17.6 billion through fiscal year 2015, with $3.9 billion in 2015, alone, according to a commission estimate.

'Consistently late’

Rolls-Royce lift-fan deliveries “have been consistently late,” because time was needed to correct quality issues, Joe DellaVedova, a spokesman for the Pentagon’s F-35 program office, said in an email. “They have taken numerous steps to improve quality.”

Even with the delays, the lift fans have been provided to Lockheed Martin in time to prevent late delivery of aircraft, he said.

Rolls-Royce spokesman George McLaren said in an e-mail the company “has worked hard to get back on track. Recovery plans have been executed and will be back on contract by the first quarter of 2013.”

“We will continue to work closely with our suppliers to ensure all components meet quality standards,” he said.

Temporary grounding

Disclosure of the lift-fan delays follow trouble with improperly crimped hoses manufactured by Stratoflex, a Pratt & Whitney subcontractor, that caused the temporary grounding Jan. 18 of the F-35B fleet for 26 days.

The Naval Air Systems Command told Navy Secretary Ray Mabus in a Feb. 12 memo that an investigation “determined that the majority of hoses” installed on 25 F-35Bs “were outside manufacturing limits.”

The Pentagon inspector general is conducting a review of how well quality is managed by F-35 contractors.

“We’ve been to several contractor and subcontracting sites” and “looked at whether the government’s getting what they paid for,” acting Inspector General Lynne Halbrooks told a House panel March 19.

“We’ve issued notices of concern with respect to the quality management and oversight at each of those plants,” she said without disclosing names.

The delayed lift fan deliveries affected the third and fourth production contracts for engines.

With improvements made by Rolls-Royce, the Pentagon estimates that lift-fan deliveries for the fifth production batch of engines will start out an average of 15 days late before exceeding the schedule by three days, according to Noble of the Defense Contract Management Agency.

Pratt cited

Separately, the agency cited Pratt & Whitney in January 2012 for “consistently missing” engine contract delivery dates in 2011. The late deliveries “were paced by final engine assembly rework due to engine vibration” and late hardware, DellaVedova said.

Pratt & Whitney was given a report requiring “corrective action” that “has the appropriate attention of senior management,” the agency said. The company submitted a “comprehensive corrective action plan to address” specific quality issues “that prevented on-time delivery,” according to the agency.

The report hasn’t yet been resolved as the agency continues to review the company’s plan, Noble said.

Pratt & Whitney spokesman Shawn Watson said in an e-mail that the company has a system to manage and measure the improvements needed “to ensure continued improvements and overall quality systems excellence.”

Noble and DellaVedova said Pratt & Whitney engine delivery performance improved last year, meeting its contractual rate of four per month.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Hiking blocks to an office after fighting traffic is not logical. Having office buildings around the loop, 465 and in cities in surrounding counties is logical. In other words, counties around Indianapolis need office buildings like Keystone, Meridian, Michigan Road/College Park and then no need to go downtown. Financial, legal, professional businesses don't need the downtown when Carmel, Fishers, North Indy are building their own central office buildings close to the professionals. The more Hamilton, Boone county attract professionals, the less downtown is relevant. Highrises have no meaning if they don't have adequate parking for professionals and clients. Great for show, but not exactly downtown Chicago, no lakefront, no river to speak of, and no view from highrises of lake Michigan and the magnificent mile. Indianapolis has no view.

  2. "The car count, THE SERIES, THE RACING, THE RATINGS, THE ATTENDANCE< AND THE MANAGEMENT, EVERY season is sub-par." ______________ You're welcome!

  3. that it actually looked a lot like Sato v Franchitti @Houston. And judging from Dario's marble mouthed presentation providing "color", I'd say that he still suffers from his Dallara inflicted head injury._______Considering that the Formula E cars weren't going that quickly at that exact moment, that was impressive air time. But I guess we shouldn't be surprised, as Dallara is the only car builder that needs an FAA certification for their cars. But flying Dallaras aren't new. Just ask Dan Wheldon.

  4. Does anyone know how and where I can get involved and included?

  5. While the data supporting the success of educating our preschoolers is significant, the method of reaching this age group should be multi-faceted. Getting business involved in support of early childhood education is needed. But the ways for businesses to be involved are not just giving money to programs and services. Corporations and businesses educating their own workforce in the importance of sending a child to kindergarten prepared to learn is an alternative way that needs to be addressed. Helping parents prepare their children for school and be involved is a proven method for success. However, many parents are not sure how to help their children. The public is often led to think that preschool education happens only in schools, daycare, or learning centers but parents and other family members along with pediatricians, librarians, museums, etc. are valuable resources in educating our youngsters. When parents are informed through work lunch hour workshops in educating a young child, website exposure to exceptional teaching ideas that illustrate how to encourage learning for fun, media input, and directed community focus on early childhood that is when a difference will be seen. As a society we all need to look outside the normal paths of educating and reaching preschoolers. It is when methods of involving the most important adult in a child's life - a parent, that real success in educating our future workers will occur. The website www.ifnotyouwho.org is free and illustrates activities that are research-based, easy to follow and fun! Businesses should be encouraging their workers to tackle this issue and this website makes it easy for parents to be involved. The focus of preschool education should be to inspire all the adults in a preschooler's life to be aware of what they can do to prepare a child for their future life. Fortunately we now know best practices to prepare a child for a successful start to school. Is the business community ready to be involved in educating preschoolers when it becomes more than a donation but a challenge to their own workers?