Rolls-Royce employees begin move to downtown campus

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Rolls-Royce Corp. began moving some of its employees to its new downtown office building on Monday—a shift an IUPUI analyst projected could generate $510 million in annual economic activity.

About 400 of the employees will be moved into the facility, dubbed the Rolls-Royce Meridian Center, by late January. The remaining 2,100 are expected to settle in by midyear, bringing the total number in the campus on South Meridian Street to 2,500.

The London-based aircraft-engine maker, which employs about 4,000 in the Indianapolis area, announced in March its plans to move office employees from two buildings on Tibbs Avenue, on Indianapolis' west side, to a downtown campus formerly occupied by Eli Lilly and Co. That allows Rolls-Royce to tear down those Tibbs Avenue office buildings and make improvements to nearby manufacturing sites on Tibbs.

City officials are in the process of reviewing a $23 million, 10-year tax abatement for Rolls-Royce, based on the number of retained jobs and investment in both its downtown and west-side properties. The company plans to invest $22 million to upgrade the downtown property and another $190 million to upgrade the Tibbs Avenue plant.

The City-County Council and its economic development committee have approved the abatement. The Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission will review it Wednesday to decide whether it should receive final approval.

Some members of the council initially critiqued the abatements because the deals don’t entail new jobs. But company officials have touted the economic development benefits of the move and consolidation effort and the 4,150 jobs the company says will be retained because of it.

A study presented to the council’s Economic Development Committee this month by IUPUI senior policy analyst Drew J. Klacik projected $510 million of economic activity would be generated from Rolls-Royce’s downtown move. An estimated $165 million of that is employee wages at an average salary of $76,000. 


  • Be carefull with those who cheat
    Rolls Royce still pay millions of Dollars a year in secret corruption and slush funds to help sell their aero engines to airlines that will be "advised" (or forced!) by those receiving the secret slush funds.
    Just one example is that Tommy Suharto (son of the ex-Indonesian president) was given about 20 million dollars and a new blue Rolls Royce car by Rolls Royce (before he was jailed for murder!) to force the Indonesian airline Garuda to take the R-R Trent 700 engine on the A330 aircraft they were buying. They got a really bad commercial deal and the follow-on warranty and support was probably the worst any operator had ever had. When Tommy was jailed, Rolls then paid his millionaire friend, Soetikno about 1 million dollars a year! This was supported by the Rolls exec in Indonesia (Dr Mike Gray) because Mike was given "personal benefit" by Soetikno to keep the contract going. Mike even used RR staff to support the bar girl he was "knocking off" when his wife was away.

    Dick Taylor. (ex Rolls-Royce Chief Service Rep)
  • No way.
    There is absolutely no way this move is creating $510M in annual economic activity. Realistically it's MAYBE a tenth of that for the short term. Implying the move is responsible for the creation of those jobs is bogus. They already exist. In Marion County. And they're not going anywhere anytime soon because the engineering talent exists here and the manufacturing agreements already exist with the UAW. Rolls-Royce has tried outsourcing manufacturing, and while the initial business cases look good, once the Long Term Agreements expire (which is already starting to happen), they are seeing 20%, 50%, and 80% increases in piece parts. That's why companies like GE are insourcing. Plus, this move doesn't guarantee any new jobs, or even retaining the existing jobs. Yet we're giving them tens of millions? This is irresponsible for the city to just give away our much needed money while simultaneously raising taxes, increasing utilities, etc. If this is REALLY that good for the city, why don't they publish their business case? Probably because it doesn't exist and is a scare tactic to the city, just like the CME used against Illinois.
  • Golden Handcuffs
    Is Develop Indy creating and enforcing "performance based" taxpayer incentives or are they just throwing money out the window hoping for the best?

    Seems to be a growing trend of the Indianapolis Metropolitan Development Commission approving taxpayer incentive packages that have accelerated company benefits, weak or missing clawback provisions, and poor terms and protections for taxpayers.

    Don't forget the city/taxpayers are financing a $156 million North of South (a.k.a City Way) project to support Rolls Royce's sublease of Eli Lilly's empty office space.

    The "City Way" plans call for 320 apartments, a 157-room conference hotel, 40,000 square feet of retail or office space, 800 parking spaces, along with a separate plan for a $18 million YMCA branch.

    That government financed incentive package (With no private financing) for "City Way" didn’t come with any job-creation commitments either or an opportunity for taxpayers to earn some return alongside the developer if the project succeeds.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?