Rolls-Royce gives downtown office market a bounce

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The decision by Rolls-Royce Corp. to occupy Eli Lilly and Co.’s Faris office campus downtown headed off what could have been a big spike in the central business district Class A office vacancy rate.

Rolls-Royce announced March 15 it would lease 404,000 square feet in two Faris-campus buildings on South Meridian Street that Lilly vacated in 2010. The aircraft-engine maker will begin moving 2,500 office employees to the site from other Indianapolis locations later this year.

Lilly had been a tenant in Faris since developing it in partnership with Kite Realty Group Trust in 2001. Because Faris was a single-tenant building, it hadn’t shown up yet in the office-vacancy statistics generated by most local commercial real estate brokerages.

The downtown vacancy rate for Class A space of 18.4 percent at the end of 2010 would have jumped to 23.4 percent if the Faris space was included, according to Summit Realty Group statistics.

“If you’re an out-of-town company looking at Indianapolis, you’re going to look at those numbers and wonder if downtown was dying,” said Tim Norton, Summit’s executive vice president. Tenants all over downtown would use those numbers to their advantage in negotiating leases, said Norton.

He said leasing the Faris space to multiple tenants would have been a big challenge because it isn’t in the heart of downtown. “Those numbers would have been with us for a long time.”   

CB Richard Ellis is thought to be the only firm that was including the vacated Faris space in its numbers. CBRE, which was hired by Lilly in 2009 to market the Faris space, started including the Faris campus in its vacancy statistics in last year’s third quarter when Lilly finished moving the 1,000 employees who had worked there.

Its preliminary data shows a Class A vacancy rate of 20.8 percent at the end of this year’s first quarter. Factoring in the Rolls-Royce lease, that number falls to 16.2 percent.  

CBRE’s Jeffrey Luebker, who represented Lilly, said the decision by Rolls-Royce to occupy the space gives downtown another “global brand,” which elevates its profile and can be helpful in the marketing of all downtown space. He listed Lilly, Simon Property Group and WellPoint as other big brands downtown.

One building on the Faris campus that Rolls-Royce isn’t leasing is the 120,000-square-foot Brougher Building, which was a high school until the late 1970s. Luebker said interest in that building has picked up in the short time since the Rolls-Royce announcement.

Luebker said that an office tenant or tenants is still the most likely use for the building, but he’s taken calls from people who’ve mentioned a variety of uses. Because it’s close to both Lilly and Rolls-Royce, an academic use playing off life sciences and technology would be a good fit, he said.

The Brougher Building is one of several large downtown spaces still available. Others include the former Safeco Corp. insurance offices at 500 N. Meridian St., where 320,000 square feet is still available. M&I Plaza, the former First Indiana Plaza at Ohio and Pennsylvania streets, has 210,000 contiguous square feet available. And PNC Bank is trying to sublease almost 100,000 square feet at PNC Plaza at Illinois and Washington streets.

Jon Owens, a senior vice president at Cassidy Turley, said the odds of filling those spaces are improving. He said tenant interest in the downtown office market began picking up in the middle of last year’s fourth quarter.

The Rolls-Royce deal will only help matters, he said, noting that there will be some vendors and service providers who want to be nearby. And the bounce should be felt by more than just office space owners and brokers, said Owens, noting the benefit of having 2,500 Rolls-Royce employees patronizing Circle Centre mall and other downtown businesses.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.