Ruling cuts $42M award for state workers seeking back pay

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Court of Appeals issued a ruling Friday that will force a trial court to reduce a $42.4 million award handed down last year to state employees who alleged they were owed back pay by roughly half.

The long-delayed 1993 suit was filed by state employees who were required to work 40 hours a week while others received the same salary for working 37.5 hours a week. The inconsistent policy was abolished about two months after the case was filed.

Marion Superior Judge John Hanley last year awarded the $42.4 million judgment to 12,000 or more past and present state employees who’d fought to recover back pay for unequal wages earned over two decades.

But the appeals court said the court must recalculate damages for union workers based on only the approximately two-month period between when the case was brought in July 1993 and when the state abolished the split-class system that fall.

The court concluded those employees were not eligible for back pay for a longer period because they had not complied with a statute requiring that they bring workplace grievances within 10 days after they arise. That time limitation did not apply to non-union workers, who still are entitled to about $18 million.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ