IBJNews

Ruling: Indiana failed to study mine's water impacts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An environmental law judge has found that Indiana failed to fully assess the impact of coal waste runoff on local waterways when it issued a permit for a southwestern Indiana surface coal mine that's the largest such mine east of the Mississippi River.

The Sierra Club in 2010 challenged Indiana's general permit for Peabody Energy's Bear Run coal mine, arguing that the state should have approved an individual permit for the Sullivan County mine. Such a permit would have required mine owner Peabody Energy to thoroughly study the mine's wastewater discharges and analyze waterways near the mine.

In a ruling issued Sept. 11, the state agency judge ruled against the Sierra Club on that argument, finding it "failed to present sufficient evidence" justifying an individual permit, and sided with the state on the groups' other claims.

But the judge found that the Indiana Department of Environmental Management failed to perform a required "antidegradation" analysis to ensure mine wastes won't harm local waterways and ruled that study must be conducted.

Jodi Perras, who oversees the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal campaign in Indiana, said the ruling recognizes that IDEM must protect local waterways "for the use of residents and wildlife."

"It's time for IDEM to start doing its job and protect the waters of Indiana from coal mine pollution, as the Clean Water Act requires," Perras said in a prepared statement.

IDEM said in a statement that it is pleased with the judge's ruling on the challenge to its general permit for the Bear Run coal mine, which opened in 2010 and produces between 8 million to 12 million tons of coal annually.

The agency said the ruling does not invalidate Indiana's general permit for the mine, but instead found that the additional analysis of the local waterways around the mine must be performed.

IDEM noted in its statement that the judge's ruling in favor of the IDEM on five of the environmental groups' six claims included the finding that the Sierra Club failed to present sufficient evidence to show that the discharges from the mine "would contribute to violations of water quality standards."

The Sierra Club was joined in its challenge of the mine's permit by the Environmental Law & Policy Center and the Hoosier Environmental Council.

Environmentalists call Indiana's general state permits for coal mines inadequate for the nature of mining operations and the potential impact on waters from runoff that contains pollutants such as mercury and arsenic.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Indiana lawmakers are bought and paid for by Coal.
    The coal mining industry in Indiana has bought and paid for Senator Jim Meritt. Meritt is chairman of the Senate Utility Committee and also Vice President of Corporate Affairs for Indiana Railroad Assoc (major coal transporter). Meritt is also a big proponent of the boondoggle Rockport Coal gasification plant that will cost the Indiana ratepayers millions $. The dirty coal industry has the best bought lawmakers money can buy.
  • Dirty Coal
    This is typical of a republican state that values wealth over health. Our state is so focused on the "ends ($$) justifying the means" that it has enacted a law that makes it illegal to photograph unhealthy & illegal business practices. Isn't that a hoot! On the one hand, we force police to have car cams to monitor police behavior, and on the other hand we are not allowed to photograph illegal business activity... something’s wrong with this picture!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.

ADVERTISEMENT