Ruling: Indiana failed to study mine's water impacts

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An environmental law judge has found that Indiana failed to fully assess the impact of coal waste runoff on local waterways when it issued a permit for a southwestern Indiana surface coal mine that's the largest such mine east of the Mississippi River.

The Sierra Club in 2010 challenged Indiana's general permit for Peabody Energy's Bear Run coal mine, arguing that the state should have approved an individual permit for the Sullivan County mine. Such a permit would have required mine owner Peabody Energy to thoroughly study the mine's wastewater discharges and analyze waterways near the mine.

In a ruling issued Sept. 11, the state agency judge ruled against the Sierra Club on that argument, finding it "failed to present sufficient evidence" justifying an individual permit, and sided with the state on the groups' other claims.

But the judge found that the Indiana Department of Environmental Management failed to perform a required "antidegradation" analysis to ensure mine wastes won't harm local waterways and ruled that study must be conducted.

Jodi Perras, who oversees the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal campaign in Indiana, said the ruling recognizes that IDEM must protect local waterways "for the use of residents and wildlife."

"It's time for IDEM to start doing its job and protect the waters of Indiana from coal mine pollution, as the Clean Water Act requires," Perras said in a prepared statement.

IDEM said in a statement that it is pleased with the judge's ruling on the challenge to its general permit for the Bear Run coal mine, which opened in 2010 and produces between 8 million to 12 million tons of coal annually.

The agency said the ruling does not invalidate Indiana's general permit for the mine, but instead found that the additional analysis of the local waterways around the mine must be performed.

IDEM noted in its statement that the judge's ruling in favor of the IDEM on five of the environmental groups' six claims included the finding that the Sierra Club failed to present sufficient evidence to show that the discharges from the mine "would contribute to violations of water quality standards."

The Sierra Club was joined in its challenge of the mine's permit by the Environmental Law & Policy Center and the Hoosier Environmental Council.

Environmentalists call Indiana's general state permits for coal mines inadequate for the nature of mining operations and the potential impact on waters from runoff that contains pollutants such as mercury and arsenic.


  • Indiana lawmakers are bought and paid for by Coal.
    The coal mining industry in Indiana has bought and paid for Senator Jim Meritt. Meritt is chairman of the Senate Utility Committee and also Vice President of Corporate Affairs for Indiana Railroad Assoc (major coal transporter). Meritt is also a big proponent of the boondoggle Rockport Coal gasification plant that will cost the Indiana ratepayers millions $. The dirty coal industry has the best bought lawmakers money can buy.
  • Dirty Coal
    This is typical of a republican state that values wealth over health. Our state is so focused on the "ends ($$) justifying the means" that it has enacted a law that makes it illegal to photograph unhealthy & illegal business practices. Isn't that a hoot! On the one hand, we force police to have car cams to monitor police behavior, and on the other hand we are not allowed to photograph illegal business activity... something’s wrong with this picture!

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.