RUSTHOVEN: Christie's ego goes beyond healthy

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

RusthovenCommentary on New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie’s current troubles, after aides snarled traffic to punish a mayor who didn’t endorse him, has focused on the impact on his presidential aspirations.

This observer was struck more by Christie’s self-absorption in his apology press conference—and what it might portend for a Christie presidency.

The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank kept score on Christie’s use of the first-person pronoun: “I,” 692 times; “I’m,” 119; “I’ve,” 67; “Me,” 83; “My/myself,” 134.

Christie viewed the event through egocentric lenses. He fired an aide because “she lied to me.” The incident had huge impact—on Christie: “I am a very sad person today.” “I got to tell you the truth. I’m sad. I’m a sad guy standing here today.” You’re breaking our hearts.

Other quotes: “I’m a very loyal guy.” “I am not a focus-group-tested, blow-dried candidate.” “I’m incredibly loyal to my people.” My favorite: “I was the class president and athlete.”

The man Christie would replace has also conquered low self-esteem. Candidate Obama said, “I think I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters. I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I’ll tell you right now that I’m gonna think I’m a better political director than my political director.”

December 2011 brought this self-assessment: “I would put our legislative and foreign policy accomplishments in our first two years against any president—with the possible exceptions of Johnson, FDR and Lincoln—just in terms of what we’ve gotten done in modern history.”

Only “possible” exceptions, mind you. He might be the best ever.

Big occasions are about him. On Nelson Mandela’s death, he sent out a picture of himself in Mandela’s jail cell, with a quote—from Obama. Rosa Parks’ refusal to move to the back of a bus is celebrated with photos of Obama on the bus. The 50th anniversary of President Kennedy’s assassination yielded a photo of (you guessed it) Obama, gazing at JFK’s portrait.

Chief GOP competitor for narcissism honors is Newt Gingrich. At the Reagan library in 2011, Gingrich said, “I helped Reagan create millions of jobs while he was president,” and, “We helped defeat the Soviet empire.”

(Really? At the time, Newt said: “Measured against the scale and momentum of the Soviet empire’s challenge, the Reagan administration has failed, is failing and without a dramatic, fundamental change in strategy, will continue to fail.”)

A 1992 note to himself outlines Newt’s 25-year plan. Sample items: “A series of books [the history of Freedom, prosperity and safety],” followed by “Campus [intellectual] appearances on ‘the histories,’” with “Gingrich the historian applying the lessons of history to public life.”

Here’s a lesson from history: Don’t talk about yourself in the third person.

A Gingrich doodle features concentric circles depicting his universe. At the center is “Gingrich,” the “System Designer.” The next circle has “staff” and “key supporters.” Orbiting in circle three are “constituents,” “media” and “interest groups.” The circle most distant from the Newtonian sun has the “public.” Wow.

It’s said politics demands a healthy ego. Yes—but “healthy” needn’t mean “huge.” Reagan’s ego was genuinely healthy—confident, at peace with himself, with a servant’s mentality that knew it wasn’t about him. The same is true of our current governor, as anyone who knows him will attest.

It’s impossible to imagine Mike Pence saying the things Chris Christie did last week. That’s another leg-up Indiana has on New Jersey.•


Rusthoven, an Indianapolis attorney and graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School, was associate counsel to President Reagan. Send comments on this column to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.