IBJNews

Sales of NBA floor space off to slow start

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

This season marks the first that the National Basketball Association is allowing teams to sell advertising space on the court. The area up for grabs, called the “apron,” is just out of bounds along the sideline. |

So far, the market is slow. According to Sports Business Journal, only three teams have sold apron ads.

The Indiana Pacers went first with a deal with the state’s Economic Development Corp. to put the slogan, “A State that Works,” on the floorboards. IBJ reported on the deal in early October.

JPMorgan Chase later added the sideline to the many spaces it owns inside Madison Square Garden during New York Knicks games. According to SBJ, the apron was “not an incremental buy,” meaning it was somehow worked into the bank’s existing sponsorship deal with MSG. And last week Samsung struck a deal with the Miami Heat.

The Heat deal follows the three-year, $100-million partnership with the NBA that Samsung announced in October. The company also has a deal with the team’s star, LeBron James. (At least one person has interpreted this as a hint that James will re-sign with the Heat when his contract expires.)

Prices for the apron deals have not been disclosed. SBJ reports that teams are holding firm in asking $1 million or more per year. In June, Eric Smallwood of Front Row Marketing Services estimated the value of the apron, which is available as a decal for regional telecasts only, at $450,00 to $2.5 million annually.

While three sales/barters in three months is not a breakneck pace, Smallwood says he expects the market will not stagnate for long. Sponsors may be waiting on the sidelines, so to speak, to see if and how the NBA makes the one-year trial permanent. And teams are likely holding out for blue chip buyers that won’t detract from the their own brands.

Smallwood expects 90 percent of the league’s 30 teams will have sold their aprons by the end of next season. “I think it’s a very valuable piece,” he says, “because it’s one of the closest ads to the players.”

Meanwhile, as Samsung pays to be in the hands and at the feet of LeBron James, Apple is getting (apparently) free advertising from Portland Trailblazers players using iPads on the bench to watch replays during games.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • One Person
    Wow, one person believes James will resign. One person. Tremendous.
  • oversimplifying
    Paul, You are oversimplifying this. The reason so few sponsors are taking this space is not because the space isn't valuable, it's because the NBA is only allowing one-year deals, and lot of organizations, whether they are government agencies or for-profit entities plan their marketing on a multi-year basis. Also, these types of deals are very market specific. What works in one market, might not work in another.
  • Can't believe it
    What? Every other state/city isn't running to pay more money to their sports teams in exchange for a silly slogan? I was so sure "A State That Works" was going to start a mad dash of government sponsorships.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT