IBJNews

Salesforce.com wraps up $2.5B acquisition of ExactTarget

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

San Francisco-based cloud computing giant Salesforce.com has completed its $2.5 billion acquisition of Indianapolis-based ExactTarget Inc., the companies announced Friday.

Salesforce.com, the largest maker of online sales software, paid $33.75 per share in cash to acquire ExactTarget, a digital marketing company that was founded in Greenfield in 2000 and went public in 2012.

The price was roughly 6.5 times ExactTarget’s projected revenue for 2013, analysts said.

"By combining ExactTarget's leading digital marketing capabilities with Salesforce.com's leading sales, service and social marketing solutions, Salesforce.com will create a world-class marketing platform across email, social, mobile and the Web," the companies said in a prepared statement.

The acquisition, announced in early June, is the biggest in Salesforce.com’s history and the eighth for the company in the past year.

Despite their rapid growth, neither company has been profitable in recent years. ExactTarget ExactTarget hasn’t reported a profit since 2008 and was expected to post losses this year and next. Salesforce.com is on a run of eight straight money-losing quarters.

ExactTarget employs about 1,800 people, with about 1,000 of those in the Indianapolis area. CEO and founder Scott Dorsey said the ExactTarget is expected to remain an independent unit of Salesforce.com and stay in Indianapolis. Analysts said Salesforce.com is likely to cut some of ExactTarget's administrative personnel as part of the merger.

Dorsey stood to realize $28 million in stock option gains from the sale. Five other ExactTarget execs were in line to receive anywhere from $6.7 million to $26.5 million in option gains.

Several of the execs, including Dorsey, were expected to receive lucrative stock bonuses for remaining with the company.

Shares of Salesforce.com rose 2.2 percent Friday morning, to $42.45 each.




 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT