Scale Computing lands $12 million in VC funding

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Scale Computing, a maker of data-storage devices that recently launched a “datacenter in a box,” has landed another $12 million in venture funding.

Leading the round is Indianapolis-based Heron Capital Venture Fund, with three Indianapolis-based firms that previously invested in tow—CID Equity, Spring Mill Venture Fund and Allos Ventures.

Also participating in the round is Benchmark Capital, a Menlo Park, Calif.-based firm that invested $9 million in Scale in early 2010 and was part of a $17 million round of funding later that year. Also involved in the latest round was Danville, Calif.-based Northgate Capital, also a previous investor.

A new investor on board this time around is Columbus, Ohio-based Reservoir Venture Partners. Investment from Heron and from Reservoir was an extra plus to Scale CEO Jeff Ready, who founded the company in California.

 “One of the challenges I think in the Midwest as far as equity investment goes is there is a lot less of it,” said Ready.

The funding will be used largely to help accelerate sales of Scale’s “HC3” product. Launched this summer, HC3 is being touted as a groundbreaking alternative to the so-called virtualization of the data center.

The virtualization trend sweeping the industry involves software licensed from firms such as VMware that that allows several operating systems to run as “virtual machines” on a single computer.

Virtualization is an alternative to investing in additional hardware such as servers. But many small and medium-sized businesses haven’t made the jump to virtualization given the cost, complexity and training requirements.

Scale is touting the HC3 device as alternative to virtualization for smaller IT departments and starts at under $25,500. It brings together storage, applications and servers into a single console. That can be one-third the cost of virtualization through the use of VMware, Scale officials say.

“Scale Computing is at the forefront of virtualization hyperconvergence,” Bill Gurley, a partner at Benchmark Capital, said in a prepared statement.

Scale already has had nearly 100 customer deployments of HC3 units in just a month after its launch, Ready said.  That’s about half of Scale’s total sales, which also include pizza-box-sized data-storage units based on the advanced parallel file system found in supercomputers.

The brisk pace of HC3 sales is in contrast to the nearly two years it took to sell an equivalent number of storage devices in the first two years of the company.  “It’s definitely surprising to the upside. I knew there was a lot of pent-up demand” for HC3, Ready said.

“In addition we have seen a lot of interest from much larger companies, which was unexpected,” Ready added.

Those include large manufacturing firms that may have 100 regional facilities.

The new venture investment is also timely as it comes just as Scale recently opened a sales office in the United Kingdom.

Company officials have been reluctant to specify sales potential, but HC3 could put Scale in a market space worth more than $5 billion a year, said Arun Taneja, founder of Boston-based Taneja  Group.

“There is a huge opportunity unfolding for us here in the midmarket with over one million companies in the U.S. looking to virtualize for the first time,” Ready said.

Scale, which employs more than 60 people and is based at Purdue University’s tech park near Indianapolis International Airport, had sales last year of about $10 million.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.