IBJNews

Second whistleblower joins suit against Rolls-Royce

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A second person has joined a lawsuit alleging Rolls-Royce Corp. concealed repeated defects at an Indianapolis aircraft engine plant and fired workers for reporting problems.

Lawyers representing the workers say in a release they filed an amended whistleblower complaint Wednesday in Indianapolis federal court. A former senior quality engineer named Keith Ramsey joined quality manager Thomas McArtor in the suit unsealed by a judge in December.

The suit says the company used parts with defects in engines and concealed defects. It also alleges the company bypassed critical safety tests to save money and speed engines production.

Law firm Loevy & Loevy says two helicopter makers,  PHI Inc. and Winward Aviation Inc., have widened probes of Rolls-Royce's manufacturing practices after two engines failed and caused crashes.

The Associated Press left a message Wednesday for a Rolls-Royce spokeswoman.

Rolls-Royce recently announced plans to move 2,500 of its more than 4,000 local employees to a downtown office complex.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • HELICOPTER CRASHES
    What if Rolls Royce is a Pentagon aviation contractor (and I'm certain they are)and they allow sub-standard parts to be sold to the Defense Department,causing pilots to crash,I would think the Pentagon would join in the lawsuit with the whistleblowers to put Rolls Royse out of business by freezing the funds until the court awards monetary damage to these good people who worked at Rolls Royce. I know how people like Rolls Royce hide their crimes by changing the name of their company and resubmit defense contract applications and end up doing the same thing all over again and the Pentagon's General Services Division doesn't even know they approved a contract with someone they caught the year before, selling junk to replace worn parts to install in military aircraft. Think of all the silenced men and women who whistleblew to the owner of Rolls Royce about the engine production horror they were witnessing and the pay discrimination; not to mention harassment abuse for whistleblowing. How about subpoenaeing all of the employee records for a suit that encompasses the entire abusive culture of this company and take your 40%,giving the rest to those whose careers and lives are destroyed by this company that not only places the lives of their employees in physical, psychological and financial danger,but the men and women of the armed forces everytime they climb aboard aircraft and fly away so Mr.and Mrs. Rolls Royce can play golf in the afternoon and dine on prime rib Saturday evening, at the expense of sacrificing the aviators' lives.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT