IBJNews

Self-funded plans draw small-firm interest

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In the face of new health reform restrictions, expect more small employers to opt for self-funded health benefits—so concludes a report this week from Indianapolis-based United Benefit Advisors LLC.

UBA, which links a network of employer-benefits agencies across the country, found in 2010 surveys that roughly 12 percent of employers with fewer than 200 workers have self-funded plans, but more are showing interest in them since the passage of the health reform law a year ago.

Among all companies surveyed by UBA last year, 12 percent of employers want to switch to self-funding someday.

“Self-funded plans will become more common and provide more control,” said Jeff Hadden, a partner of Indianapolis-based LHD Benefits, also known as LoCascio Hadden & Dennis LLC, in the UBA report.

A self-funded health benefits plan requires an employer to pay its workers’ medical claims rather than paying an insurance company to handle them. Self-funded means a company bears the risk of really large claims. Therefore, many self-funded employers buy stop-loss insurance that kicks in for large one-time bills or when overall claims reach a high threshold.

Employers like self-funded plans because the costs can be less, but the drawback is costs can be unpredictable.

The new law tries to hold down prices for all firms by requiring insurers to spend at least 80 percent of premiums on health benefits, something called a minimum medical-loss ratio. Also, the new health reform law will no longer allow health insurers selling fully funded coverage to price their policies based on the health status of an employers’ workers. For health plans covering fewer than 100 people, insurers will be able to adjust prices only for age, tobacco use, family versus self-coverage and region.

This so-called “community rating system” will benefit employers with unhealthy workers. However, the new rules likely will raise costs for companies with healthy workers. Also, because community rating sets prices based on a pool of employers in one geographic region, efforts by individual companies to use wellness programs to improve their workers’ health would have minimal effect on the cost of coverage.

“The sickest groups will remain fully funded and rely on community rates and mandated medical-loss ratios,” said Hadden at LHD Benefits. He added, “If groups are self-funded with appropriate levels of protection in place, they have more control over their costs and don’t have to be driven by the community rate.”

Stop-loss insurers, recognizing the growing interest from small firms, recently started offering coverage for employers with as few as 25 workers, Hadden noted.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • ASO for small group
    There is some talk in the development of self funded plan for groups as small as 35 lives. The national carriers are working on a ASO type plan where all the stop loss insurance is bundled. We could see spec rates as low as $15,000. The community rating system would force most healthy groups to look at this type of option.
  • Self Funded Plans, Inc.
    The economy seems to have come out from hibernation! More small companies are now able to accept the risk of self funding their health plan. I have markets that will write a stop loss policy on an employer as small as 15 employees! If you are a decision maker on your companies health insurance plan, make sure your broker/agent is at least mentioning Self Funding as an option.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT