IBJNews

Senate OKs ban on tanning for those under 16

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A bill that would ban young people from using beds at tanning salons passed 30-17 Thursday in the state Senate.

Currently, those younger than 16 can use the beds if a parent is present, and those 16 to 18 can tan alone with written permission from a parent or guardian. The proposed measure would ban anyone younger than 16 from tanning, and it still would require those 16 to 18 to have written permission.

Sen. Mark Stoops of Bloomington said the bill could help parents combat the "awesome power of the teenage girl who wants something their friends have" and protect children from the dangers of skin cancer.

But Sen. Jim Smith of Charlestown pointed out a loophole that would not ban children of any age from tanning at in-home beds. Smith also questioned whether the responsibility to decide what is healthy for children should fall to the state or parents.

"This bill literally is a slippery slope," said Smith, one of the 17 lawmakers who voted against the bill.

Sen. Patricia Miller of Indianapolis, the bill's author, said it has gained support from the tanning industry. However, some local business owners say the measure is not necessary.

Bronze Bay Tanning Center owner Marcy DeShong said state laws already in place are enough to protect minors. She said few children younger than 17 visit her business, and those who do usually come for health reasons: a boost of vitamin D or treatment for acne.

She hopes lawmakers amend the bill to allow minors to tan with a prescription.

"You can't produce vitamin D in Indiana in the winter," DeShong said. "Not if your shadow is longer than you are tall."

The bill still has to pass the House before it can be sent to the governor. It would be go into effect immediately upon the governor signing it.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Help
    Please pass a law to tell me what I should feed my kids. They are starving because I am just stupid to figure it out on my own.
  • Another Joke
    Another state senator sitting around thinking up nanny state rules and regulations. Pat it is time to retire.
  • Is the sun banned?
    Kidding, I think this is a good step--ask any man or woman with brown spots covering her hands/chest.
  • winter tan
    This sounds like unnecessary legislation. Restricting tanning to those with a doctor's note would be no different from legalizing marijuana for people with a medical need. There would be so many prescriptions written to counter phantom symptoms that it's not worth regulating it in the first place.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Can your dog sign a marriage license or personally state that he wishes to join you in a legal union? If not then no, you cannot marry him. When you teach him to read, write, and speak a discernible language, then maybe you'll have a reasonable argument. Thanks for playing!

  2. Look no further than Mike Rowe, the former host of dirty jobs, who was also a classically trained singer.

  3. Current law states income taxes are paid to the county of residence not county of income source. The most likely scenario would be some alteration of the income tax distribution formula so money earned in Marion co. would go to Marion Co by residents of other counties would partially be distributed to Marion co. as opposed to now where the entirety is held by the resident's county.

  4. This is more same-old, same-old from a new generation of non-progressive 'progressives and fear mongers. One only needs to look at the economic havoc being experienced in California to understand the effect of drought on economies and people's lives. The same mindset in California turned a blind eye to the growth of population and water needs in California, defeating proposal after proposal to build reservoirs, improve water storage and delivery infrastructure...and the price now being paid for putting the demands of a raucous minority ahead of the needs of many. Some people never, never learn..

  5. I wonder if I can marry him too? Considering we are both males, wouldn't that be a same sex marriage as well? If they don't honor it, I'll scream discrimination just like all these people have....

ADVERTISEMENT