Senate panel refuses to fund GE engine made by Rolls-Royce

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A U.S. Senate panel on Tuesday refused to fund General Electric Co.’s back-up engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in its fiscal 2011 defense budget, according to a press release.

The decision holds potential bad news for Indianapolis engine maker Rolls-Royce, which produces the enginest. Rolls-Royce, part of London-based Rolls-Royce Group PLC, is the region's second-largest manufacturer, behind Eli Lilly and Co., with about 4,300 local employees.

The Senate defense appropriations subcommittee, in approving $671 billion for defense, followed the lead of the chamber’s committee that authorizes defense programs.

The U.S. House has taken a different view, with its defense appropriations panel in July adding $450 million for the alternate engine. That was after the full House included funding for the engine in the measure it passed that authorizes military programs and sets defense policy for fiscal 2011.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates says a second engine is a wasteful expense. President Barack Obama said after the House authorization bill passed May 28 that he would veto the legislation if its final version includes the funding.

If the full Senate approves the appropriations panel’s budget, the engine’s fate will be decided by House and Senate negotiators later this year. A similar scenario unfolded with the fiscal 2010 budget: The House approved $465 million for the engine and the Senate did not. The money was finally approved by congressional negotiators.

The Senate Armed Services Committee rejected money for the engine in its version of the authorization bill. The full Senate hasn’t voted on that measure. House and Senate versions of the authorization and appropriations budgets must be reconciled and their joint measure must signed by the president before becoming law.

Pratt & Whitney supplies the primary engine for the Lockheed Martin Corp. jet fighter and opposes the GE program.

The battle in Congress pits supporters of Fairfield, Conn.-based GE and partner London-based Rolls-Royce Group Plc, who are clustered in Ohio, Indiana, Massachusetts and Virginia where GE has operations, against supporters of Pratt & Whitney in Maine, Connecticut and Florida, states where Pratt has facilities.

The bill the Senate defense appropriations panel passed today includes $157.7 billion for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If what you stated is true, then this article is entirely inaccurate. "State sells bonds" is same as "State borrows money". Supposedly the company will "pay for them". But since we are paying the company, we are still paying for this road with borrowed money, even though the state has $2 billion in the bank.

  2. Andrew hit the nail on the head. AMTRAK provides terrible service and that is why the state has found a contractor to improve the service. More trips, on-time performance, better times, cleanliness and adequate or better restrooms. WI-FI and food service will also be provided. Transit from outlying areas will also be provided. I wouldn't take it the way it is but with the above services and marketing of the service,ridership will improve and more folks will explore Indy and may even want to move here.

  3. They could take the property using eminent domain and save money by not paying the church or building a soccer field and a new driveway. Ctrwd has monthly meetings open to all customers of the district. The meetings are listed and if the customers really cared that much they would show. Ctrwd works hard in every way they can to make sure the customer is put first. Overflows damage the surrounding environment and cost a lot of money every year. There have been many upgrades done through the years to help not send flow to Carmel. Even with the upgrades ctrwd cannot always keep up. I understand how a storage tank could be an eye sore, but has anyone thought to look at other lift stations or storage tanks. Most lift stations are right in the middle of neighborhoods. Some close to schools and soccer fields, and some right in back yards, or at least next to a back yard. We all have to work together to come up with a proper solution. The proposed solution by ctrwd is the best one offered so far.

  4. Fox has comments from several people that seem to have some inside information. I would refer to their website. Changed my whole opionion of this story.

  5. This place is great! I'm piggy backing and saying the Cobb salad is great. But the ribs are awesome. $6.49 for ribs and 2 sides?! They're delicious. If you work downtown, head over there.