Senate panel refuses to fund GE engine made by Rolls-Royce

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A U.S. Senate panel on Tuesday refused to fund General Electric Co.’s back-up engine for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter in its fiscal 2011 defense budget, according to a press release.

The decision holds potential bad news for Indianapolis engine maker Rolls-Royce, which produces the enginest. Rolls-Royce, part of London-based Rolls-Royce Group PLC, is the region's second-largest manufacturer, behind Eli Lilly and Co., with about 4,300 local employees.

The Senate defense appropriations subcommittee, in approving $671 billion for defense, followed the lead of the chamber’s committee that authorizes defense programs.

The U.S. House has taken a different view, with its defense appropriations panel in July adding $450 million for the alternate engine. That was after the full House included funding for the engine in the measure it passed that authorizes military programs and sets defense policy for fiscal 2011.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates says a second engine is a wasteful expense. President Barack Obama said after the House authorization bill passed May 28 that he would veto the legislation if its final version includes the funding.

If the full Senate approves the appropriations panel’s budget, the engine’s fate will be decided by House and Senate negotiators later this year. A similar scenario unfolded with the fiscal 2010 budget: The House approved $465 million for the engine and the Senate did not. The money was finally approved by congressional negotiators.

The Senate Armed Services Committee rejected money for the engine in its version of the authorization bill. The full Senate hasn’t voted on that measure. House and Senate versions of the authorization and appropriations budgets must be reconciled and their joint measure must signed by the president before becoming law.

Pratt & Whitney supplies the primary engine for the Lockheed Martin Corp. jet fighter and opposes the GE program.

The battle in Congress pits supporters of Fairfield, Conn.-based GE and partner London-based Rolls-Royce Group Plc, who are clustered in Ohio, Indiana, Massachusetts and Virginia where GE has operations, against supporters of Pratt & Whitney in Maine, Connecticut and Florida, states where Pratt has facilities.

The bill the Senate defense appropriations panel passed today includes $157.7 billion for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now