IBJNews

Senate passes bill allowing state fair alcohol sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana State Fair visitors would be able to purchase alcohol for the first time since 1947 under a bill passed by the Senate on Thursday.

Senate Bill 168 would allow Indiana breweries and wineries to sell their beverages in a designated area. Those under 21 would not be allowed into the barred off section.

“I think I can stand here and assure you that this will be tightly controlled. This will be Indiana wines, Indiana beers,” said Sen. Jim Merritt, R-Indianapolis.

The State Fair Commission estimated it would make $110,000 between 2015 and 2016 from the alcohol sales.

But the fair would also have to spend money on more security for the alcohol areas.

Opponents of the bill said the sale of alcohol may hinder the “family-friendly environment” the State Fair is known for.

The bill now moves to the House.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Changes the bill has gone through?
    When I first starting following this bill, it said if passed, it would allow the sale of alcohol at the state fair. Now that it's passed the Senate, it seems to have narrowed it down to just Indiana breweries and wineries. Does anyone know when this change came about, what Senator stressed that it be changed, etc.?
  • Less Lobbying Against It
    There isn't an organized lobby opposed to selling alcohol at the fair, so it was easily passed. There's a very organized, vocal, and well-connected lobby of hilbillies in this state, by contrast, who don't feel like working Sunday, and want the government to prevent their competitors from choosing to work Sundays. Really all it boils down to.
  • Public drinking
    Why is it much easier to pass a law that enables drinking in public than one which involves purchasing for home consumption?
    • Rednecks, Oppressive Heat, & Alcohol
      What could possibly go wrong?!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

    2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

    3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    4. If you only knew....

    5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    ADVERTISEMENT