IBJNews

Senator asks Zimmer for info about product complaints

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Warsaw-based Zimmer Holdings Inc., the world’s biggest maker of artificial hips and knee joints, was asked by a U.S. senator to disclose information about how it handles complaints about its products.

In a letter, Senator Charles Grassley asked Chief Executive Officer David C. Dvorak to list reports of “safety concerns or problems” reported by Zimmer’s consultants or contractors since January 2008, along with how the company responded. Grassley, an Iowa Republican, also called for Zimmer to provide information on how it tracks the long-term performance of its orthopedic devices.

The request comes at a time when lawmakers are trying to stem rising health-care costs, which have increased at 2.5 times the rate of inflation annually. List prices for artificial hips and knees have risen 5.6 percent so far this year, on top of a 130 percent increase in the average selling price of a hip between 1996 and 2008, according to Orthopedic Network News, a trade journal that tracks costs.

Grassley’s inquiry stemmed from an article in the New York Times about a dispute between Zimmer and two of its consultants about whether and why artificial hips and knees were failing in patients after being implanted. In both cases, Zimmer blamed the surgical techniques, while the consultants blamed the devices, the Times said.

“Zimmer welcomes the opportunity to speak with Senator Grassley,” Charlie Young, a Zimmer spokesman, said in an e- mailed statement.

Feedback from physicians “can lead to modifications and improvements to products, their labeling and the manner in which we train and educate surgeons about our products,” Young said.

Zimmer shares rose 83 cents to $52.99 yesterday in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The stock has slipped 10 percent this year.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT