IBJNews

Shareholder group advises against Simon CEO bonus pay

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc. is firing back at a corporate governance advisory firm that recommended Simon shareholders vote against a $120 million retention award for CEO David Simon.

Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. argues in a 20-page report issued May 1 that the employment agreement's incentive award "lacks performance conditions" and creates the potential for "pay-for-failure" since it requires only that Simon remain at the company, not that he continue performing at a high level.

Simon, 50, would have to remain as CEO of the world's largest real estate company through 2019 to collect the entire $120 million in special stock awards; he's entitled to collect the payout in thirds starting in 2017. His new employment agreement, signed in July, also calls for Simon to earn a minimum $1.25 million per year, a targeted cash bonus of double his salary, and annual stock awards worth at least $12 million.

That adds up to $30.8 million per year, ISS wrote, a sum that's about three times the median pay for "similarly situated peers." ISS said the board makes a "strong case" that Simon's service is vital to the company's future, but concerns remain.

"While currently the company's performance may warrant high pay, the bulk of the opportunity is subject to no performance conditions and the board has no discretion to adjust its incentive approach for the next eight years," ISS wrote. "It cannot add performance conditions to the retention award or adjust the mix of equity and nonequity incentives."

ISS also recommends shareholders vote against adding 6 million additional shares to an existing stock incentive plan for top Simon executives, but it suggests votes in support of the company's slate of board members. The say-on-pay vote, scheduled for the company's annual meeting May 17 at its Indianapolis headquarters, is advisory only and nonbinding.

In a letter to shareholders, Simon said ISS' recommendation ignores the company's size, growth and performance compared to peers.

The letter notes several performance metrics the company attributes to David Simon: a 10-year return of 597 percent compared with 58 percent for the Standard & Poor's 500; the highest investment grade rating among public U.S. retail real estate firms; and a jump in equity market value during Simon's tenure from $2 billion in 1995, when he took over as CEO, to $57 billion on May 3.

The company this year joined the Standard & Poor's 100 Index, a listing of the nation’s largest and most established companies, including Apple, Coca-Cola and McDonald’s.

"Our long-term record of creating stockholder value leads our industry and is among the best in all of corporate America," the company said in its shareholder letter, a copy of which it filed with the SEC. "This value creation is directly and demonstrably a result of David Simon's leadership. He is recognized as the best CEO in our business and that is why your board of directors believed it was critical to retain [him] for the foreseeable future."

The company noted that more than 90 percent of David Simon's annual target compensation will continue to be "at-risk" and realized only if Simon sticks around and the company's stock price continues to rise.

ISS classifies the $120 million retention award as part of Simon's 2011 pay, for a total of more than $137 million on the year, giving him a payday that's 12 times the median level of peer CEOs.

But Simon disagrees with the firm's intepretation, saying it will account for the award over the eight years of the contract.

The company's compensation committee, in explaining the rationale for the award, said David Simon had been offered jobs in other industries that would pay him far more than he had been making as leader of the company founded by his late father, Melvin Simon, and uncle Herb Simon.

The committee concluded its rationale for Simon’s special award by stating, “The decision was subjective and not determined by reference to any peer group or formula.”

That's a problem in the eyes of ISS.

"The reason given by the compensation committee for the retention award is the board's confidence that Mr. Simon's leadership is necessary for the future success of the company," ISS wrote. "It follows that the future success of the company should be a condition for the significant payment that is required to secure his continued service."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT