IBJNews

Shortage of big programs slows secondary Final Four ticket sales

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The NCAA Final Four men's basketball tournament April 3-5 in Indianapolis is already a sellout. But it's taking longer than usual to rid the secondary market of available seats, according to ticket brokers.

As of Tuesday afternoon, thousands of tickets were still available for the two games on Saturday and the championship game on Monday, according to national broker databases.

While the Duke University and Michigan State University have big basketball fan bases, Butler University and West Virginia aren't traditional powers. And early-round upsets of big-time programs Kansas University and the University of Kentucky, both No. 1 seeds, put a flood of tickets back on the market.

So, despite the Butler Bulldogs’ improbable run to the Final Four as a No. 5 seed, and the inspiring storylines generated by their appearance at hometown Lucas Oil Stadium, it’s not translating into brisk ticket sales.

“We’ve seen a lot better Final Fours,” lamented Dave Brusslan, president of Indianapolis-based based Preferred Tickets & Tours Inc. “Nationwide demand is way down.”

Brusslan said a total of about 2,500 tickets remain for Saturday’s two-game session and another 2,500 for the championship game on Monday.

Palo Alto, Calif.-based FanSnap, a national ticket search engine, pegged the number at closer to 10,000—3,000 for Saturday’s games and 7,000 for the championship.

“With all the upsets, it’s turned the tournament upside down,” FanSnap spokesman Christian Anderson said. “Fans who bought tickets ahead of time are not coming now, so there’s a lot more tickets coming in.”

Indeed, the Butler Bulldogs upset the top-seeded Syracuse Orangemen and the No. 2-seeded Kansas State Wildcats in the West region. The top-seeded Kansas Jayhawks in the Midwest were upended by the No. 9-seeded Northern Iowa Panthers, paving the way for the No. 5-seeded Michigan State Spartans to tip off against Butler on Saturday.

The No. 2-seeded West Virginia Mountaineers defeated the East region’s top-seeded Kentucky Wildcats, giving them a shot at the Duke Blue Devils of the South region. Duke is the Final Four’s lone No. 1 seed.

Ticket brokers attribute the soft ticket sales, in particular, to the Kentucky and Kansas losses.

“We saw a lot of selling after they were knocked out,” Anderson said.

The result: Better deals are likely for basketball fans contemplating a trip to Indianapolis. Prices are a “bit lower” than in past years, Anderson said.

Still, a lower-level semifinal ticket at either end of the court is running between $658 and $2,077, while a lower-level mid-court ticket will cost between $1,800 to $8,800. Upper-level tickets can be found as low as $220 and as high as $3,299.

Not surprising, the most interest for tickets, based on search numbers, is coming from Indiana, West Virginia and Michigan, Anderson said.

Sports economists fear an influx of fans attending the Final Four from the Hoosier state, or the host city, will dampen spending on hotels and restaurants. City officials estimate visitor spending could reach $50 million, although economists are skeptical of the figure.

They contend direct visitor spending will decline anywhere from 10 percent to 25 percent, which translates to a loss of $5 million to $12.5 million, due to Butler’s appearance in the tournament.

Hoteliers, however, are feeling more confident about their prospects as the Final Four approaches. The Crowne Plaza downtown, one of four hotels designated by the NCAA to host a team’s fans, drew the winner of the West region—Butler.

About 215 of the roughly 270 rooms are reserved four nights, from Thursday through Monday, for Butler fans. The NCAA notified the Crowne Plaza on Tuesday that all of the rooms have been booked, alleviating the fears of Glenn Brooks, vice president of sales and marketing for Indianapolis-based General Hotels Corp., which owns the hotel.

“I was the initial worrywart,” he said, “but it’s all doing absolutely fine.”

Even hoteliers outside of downtown are optimistic about their chances to bolster their revenues. For instance, each of the 122 rooms at the Hilton Garden Inn on the northwest side is booked, said Michael Conner, regional general manager for Hilton and chairman of the Indiana Hotel & Lodging Association.

“I know I’ve been hearing, ‘you won’t be getting a lot of impact because Butler is playing,’ but it’s just the opposite,” Conner said. “We’ve had Butler alumni call, fans from Michigan State, West Virginia and Duke.”

The debate about whether Butler’s appearance in the Final Four will reflect negatively on Indianapolis’ economy is wearing thin on university spokesman Marc Allan.

Butler boasts 43,000 active alumni, 25,000 of whom reside outside of Indiana, Allan said, while maintaining the university’s graduates will support local establishments just as much as other fans.

“To suggest that 25 percent of the revenue somehow goes away just because there is a local team in the tournament is absurd,” he said. “They’re going to come here; they’re going to eat downtown; they’re going to stay downtown.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • But......
    It appears that Butler prides itself on academics, building relationships, and community but obviously not proper grammar. Nevertheless, I am rooting for the Bulldogs.
  • Time to grow up
    Time to grow up, Jonathan. As it played out, Duke had the hardest road to the Final Four. The bias against Duke knows no bounds, certainly no logical bounds.
  • duke fans
    I blame the NCAA on this one. Year in and year out they give Duke the easiest bracket. Seriously there aren't that many Duke fans. If they want more revenue, then they should give Duke what they deserve. Duke can barely fill up Cameron Indoor Stadium and it only seats about 10,000. West Virginia deserved the #1 seed in the South, anyone who knows anything about basketball knows that. If Duke were in Kentucky's bracket then Kentucky would be in the final four and we know what kind of fans they have. West Virginia will punish Duke.
  • It could have been...
    Butler, IUPUI, Purdue, and IU. But it wasn't.
  • Mt. Rushmore Seating
    Perhaps not so much that there is NCAA B-Ball disinterest, but rather folks don't particularly want to see the Sessions from what is akin to seeing them from the top of Mt. Rushmore. C'mon guys, once you get beyond 15,000 seats in a basketball arena, the rest are horrible, so that's 70,000 - 15,000 = 55,000 (horrible) seats. Greed, like Pride, goeth before the fall!!

    Mike
  • Planets Aligning
    Butler is a great school that prides itself on academics, building relationships, and community. As a graduate of Butler I can attest, we have been waiting for this opportunity. What scenario could be better to draw an allumni base from coast to coast than a trifecta of gathering with old friends, supporting you school, and enjoying the very welcoming city of Indianapolis. As a liberal arts institution, Buter prepares its allumni to be adaptive and successful. Butler allumni will return in droves not only to support the Dawgs, but to support Indianapolis and reconnect with friends, needless to say spending lots of cash buying mementos and celebrating in bars and restaraunts all weekend. Go Dawgs!!
  • Enough already!
    How many times are you going to report on the possible decline in revenue? We've all seen the story too many times already. I'm not saying it's not true, but more positive than negative will come just from Indianapolis hosting the Final Four, and from having one of our home town schools in the Final. Now that the drop-in-revenue story has been covered a number of times, maybe we can all focus on the positive, at least until after the final game.

    Good luck Dawgs!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT