IBJNews

Sides ponder political fallout of Statehouse boycott

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Both Democrats and Republicans claim the ongoing boycott by Indiana House Democrats is rallying support for their side, spurring new donations and rousing the party faithful. But the long-term political fallout from the boycott may be less consequential than some predict because it's a long way until November 2012.

"Right now, the walkout is galvanizing Democrats behind the Democrats. It is galvanizing Republicans behind Republicans," said Andy Downs, director of the Mike Downs Center for Indiana Politics at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne. "The question is that mass of voters in the middle."

House Democrats fled the state for Illinois on Feb. 22 to derail a host of Republican-backed proposals they consider an attack on labor unions and public education. State Democratic Party Chairman Dan Parker says the walkout has brought in new donations from those who consider the Republican agenda overreaching and harmful to the middle class.

"Some of the issues that Republicans have embraced will come back to bite them next year," Parker said. "They're going to suffer the ramifications."

Several Indiana union members who rallied at the Statehouse in recent weeks have said they regret not voting in the last election, and say they'll pay more attention to politics in the future. Parker acknowledged that the boycott is primarily energizing his party's base right now — but said that's just what Democrats need.

"The base of the Democratic Party wasn't as engaged as it needed to be in 2010," Parker said. "There's been an awakening for a whole lot of folks."

Many House Democrats who survived the 2010 election — in which Republicans took control of the Indiana House with a commanding 60-40 majority — come from legislative districts considered safe for Democrats.

But Republicans are hopeful that they still have room to pick up more seats in 2012. Democrats won tight races in a handful of seats in 2010, and the GOP holds the power to redraw political maps through redistricting this year. Picking up seven more seats in the House would allow Republicans to conduct business even if Democrats boycotted, and many believe the Democrats' boycott could help the GOP toward that goal.

State Republican Party Chairman Eric Holcomb said House Democrats have defined themselves by walking off the job.

"This will be their legacy for some time coming," Holcomb said. "I think Hoosiers and taxpayers in general expect you to participate in Democracy no matter what party you're a member of."

Both parties have boycotted before and the public tends to quickly forget small skirmishes, Downs noted. But this standoff is more memorable because Democrats fled the state, not just the House chambers, and it's stretching on for weeks, not days.

Republicans say it's the longest walkout in state history, and it has gained more media attention than previous walkouts — including plenty of national coverage since Indiana's boycott came after some Wisconsin lawmakers took similar action.

But whether the boycott makes any real difference in the 2012 elections will largely come down to how the standoff ends, Downs said. It has the potential to derail many bills, but so far Republican leaders in the Statehouse say they are moving on without House Democrats and few proposals are actually dead.

The boycott's effects on 2012 will also be determined by political spin, Downs said. Democrats are already portraying themselves as defenders of workers' rights, even though fewer than 10 percent of workers in Indiana belong to a union.

"The Republicans clearly aren't on the side of the middle class," Parker said.

Republicans, meanwhile, say the majority of Indiana residents back their proposals and say voters are frustrated with Democrats who left.

"The way for Democrats to ensure voters move on and turn the page on this footnote of failure will be through participating in the process," Holcomb said. "Until they do that, it will be on voters' minds."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Amen
    I'm definitely beyond "middle class" ("Working poor" comes closer), and I'd NEVER voluntarily join another union. Twice, unions have actually COST me my job due to their over-reaching wage demands that the company just could not afford. Nope, I'm 100,000% in favor of the right-to-work bill, and the one that will eliminate ISTA and its local affiliates - teachers should be paid based on their classroom performance, not how long they've been working for some school or other (or how ling they went to college, for that matter). If it's "for the children", then TEACH, dagnabbit! There's no real excuse for a high school student to be reading at 4th grade level. I wasn't; I was reading at least three to four grades HIGHER than grade by the time I entered high school - and I had NO, ZIP, NADA, NONE! union teachers. They were all dedicated professionals who really DID care about their students. And don't try playing the "special needs" card - those children should be assigned special schools and teachers who know and understand how to deal with whatever the issue that student has. About the only "special needs" students who should be "mainstreamed" are the ones who have a relatively MINOR physical disability, such as the one young lady who was sharp as a tack, but was a paraplegic. "Mainstreaming" a severely mentally handicapped child is beyond ridiculous - it robs the other students of their time with the teacher. But don't try to tell that to the ISTA; oh no! They'll run you right out of town!
  • Power to the People
    Who enjoys their weekends? Who enjoys working 8 hour days? Who enjoys health insurance? Thank your labor unions for these perks. Executives with their cronies and all their corporate drones would continue to pad their greedy wallets at the expense of the workers if not for unions. Without people, business would not exist. The people come first. Support the better of the whole, not the few. In Solidarity.
  • Really?
    "'The Republicans clearly aren't on the side of the middle class,' Parker said."

    Really? I'm in the middle class, and the Republicans seem to be on my side. The absentee Democrats and their Union bosses certainly aren't.
  • Failure to fulfill oath of office
    Any politician leaving (in protest) during a session should be recalled.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT