IBJNews

Sides ponder political fallout of Statehouse boycott

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Both Democrats and Republicans claim the ongoing boycott by Indiana House Democrats is rallying support for their side, spurring new donations and rousing the party faithful. But the long-term political fallout from the boycott may be less consequential than some predict because it's a long way until November 2012.

"Right now, the walkout is galvanizing Democrats behind the Democrats. It is galvanizing Republicans behind Republicans," said Andy Downs, director of the Mike Downs Center for Indiana Politics at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne. "The question is that mass of voters in the middle."

House Democrats fled the state for Illinois on Feb. 22 to derail a host of Republican-backed proposals they consider an attack on labor unions and public education. State Democratic Party Chairman Dan Parker says the walkout has brought in new donations from those who consider the Republican agenda overreaching and harmful to the middle class.

"Some of the issues that Republicans have embraced will come back to bite them next year," Parker said. "They're going to suffer the ramifications."

Several Indiana union members who rallied at the Statehouse in recent weeks have said they regret not voting in the last election, and say they'll pay more attention to politics in the future. Parker acknowledged that the boycott is primarily energizing his party's base right now — but said that's just what Democrats need.

"The base of the Democratic Party wasn't as engaged as it needed to be in 2010," Parker said. "There's been an awakening for a whole lot of folks."

Many House Democrats who survived the 2010 election — in which Republicans took control of the Indiana House with a commanding 60-40 majority — come from legislative districts considered safe for Democrats.

But Republicans are hopeful that they still have room to pick up more seats in 2012. Democrats won tight races in a handful of seats in 2010, and the GOP holds the power to redraw political maps through redistricting this year. Picking up seven more seats in the House would allow Republicans to conduct business even if Democrats boycotted, and many believe the Democrats' boycott could help the GOP toward that goal.

State Republican Party Chairman Eric Holcomb said House Democrats have defined themselves by walking off the job.

"This will be their legacy for some time coming," Holcomb said. "I think Hoosiers and taxpayers in general expect you to participate in Democracy no matter what party you're a member of."

Both parties have boycotted before and the public tends to quickly forget small skirmishes, Downs noted. But this standoff is more memorable because Democrats fled the state, not just the House chambers, and it's stretching on for weeks, not days.

Republicans say it's the longest walkout in state history, and it has gained more media attention than previous walkouts — including plenty of national coverage since Indiana's boycott came after some Wisconsin lawmakers took similar action.

But whether the boycott makes any real difference in the 2012 elections will largely come down to how the standoff ends, Downs said. It has the potential to derail many bills, but so far Republican leaders in the Statehouse say they are moving on without House Democrats and few proposals are actually dead.

The boycott's effects on 2012 will also be determined by political spin, Downs said. Democrats are already portraying themselves as defenders of workers' rights, even though fewer than 10 percent of workers in Indiana belong to a union.

"The Republicans clearly aren't on the side of the middle class," Parker said.

Republicans, meanwhile, say the majority of Indiana residents back their proposals and say voters are frustrated with Democrats who left.

"The way for Democrats to ensure voters move on and turn the page on this footnote of failure will be through participating in the process," Holcomb said. "Until they do that, it will be on voters' minds."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Amen
    I'm definitely beyond "middle class" ("Working poor" comes closer), and I'd NEVER voluntarily join another union. Twice, unions have actually COST me my job due to their over-reaching wage demands that the company just could not afford. Nope, I'm 100,000% in favor of the right-to-work bill, and the one that will eliminate ISTA and its local affiliates - teachers should be paid based on their classroom performance, not how long they've been working for some school or other (or how ling they went to college, for that matter). If it's "for the children", then TEACH, dagnabbit! There's no real excuse for a high school student to be reading at 4th grade level. I wasn't; I was reading at least three to four grades HIGHER than grade by the time I entered high school - and I had NO, ZIP, NADA, NONE! union teachers. They were all dedicated professionals who really DID care about their students. And don't try playing the "special needs" card - those children should be assigned special schools and teachers who know and understand how to deal with whatever the issue that student has. About the only "special needs" students who should be "mainstreamed" are the ones who have a relatively MINOR physical disability, such as the one young lady who was sharp as a tack, but was a paraplegic. "Mainstreaming" a severely mentally handicapped child is beyond ridiculous - it robs the other students of their time with the teacher. But don't try to tell that to the ISTA; oh no! They'll run you right out of town!
  • Power to the People
    Who enjoys their weekends? Who enjoys working 8 hour days? Who enjoys health insurance? Thank your labor unions for these perks. Executives with their cronies and all their corporate drones would continue to pad their greedy wallets at the expense of the workers if not for unions. Without people, business would not exist. The people come first. Support the better of the whole, not the few. In Solidarity.
  • Really?
    "'The Republicans clearly aren't on the side of the middle class,' Parker said."

    Really? I'm in the middle class, and the Republicans seem to be on my side. The absentee Democrats and their Union bosses certainly aren't.
  • Failure to fulfill oath of office
    Any politician leaving (in protest) during a session should be recalled.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT