Simon Property earnings fall on debt-retirement expenditures

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Simon Property Group Inc., the largest U.S. shopping-mall owner, said first-quarter earnings, excluding some items, declined as the company recorded costs from the early retirement of debt.

Funds from operations fell to $325.6 million, or 94 cents a share, from $476.8 million, or $1.61 a year earlier, the Indianapolis-based company said Friday morning. Excluding the $165.6 million debt cost, FFO, a key measure for real estate investment trusts, rose to $491.2 million.

Simon raised the low end of its full-year profit forecast and said its tenants are reporting improving revenue. Retail sales rose 1.6 percent in March even as unemployment lingered near a 26-year high, according to the Commerce Department.

Mall owners are beginning to benefit from “further strength in retail sales and continued evidence of a rebound in discretionary spending,” UBS Securities LLC analysts led by Ross Nussbaum and Christy McElroy said in an April 15 report to investors. “Stronger national retailers are showing signs of taking incremental space in high quality centers.”

On a per-share basis, adjusted FFO was $1.41. The average estimate in a Bloomberg survey of 16 analysts was for FFO of 84 cents.

David Simon, CEO of Simon Property, said this week he’s not expecting a strong industry rebound until the United States sees more job creation.

“I’m a little more conservative than some, but I think it’s way too early to declare victory for the consumer and for commercial real estate,” Simon said during an April 27 panel discussion at the Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, Calif.

FFO is a measure of cash flow used by real estate investment trusts. It excludes depreciation and other items and doesn’t conform to generally accepted accounting principles.

Simon raised the bottom end of its forecast for 2010 adjusted FFO to $5.77 from $5.72. The top of the range is $5.87.

Simon announced results before the start of regular U.S. trading. The shares rose $5.47, or 4.8 percent, to $92.42 Thursday. The shares gained 83 percent in the 12 months through Thursday, compared with a 71 percent increase in the Bloomberg Real Estate Investment Trust Index.

Simon has been trying to buy or gain a stake in its largest competitor, Chicago-based General Growth Properties Inc., which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy a year ago.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.