IBJNews

Simon Property Group signs CEO to long-term contract

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Simon Property Group Inc., the biggest U.S. mall owner, signed an employment agreement with CEO David Simon that will keep him as head of the Indianapolis-based company for the next eight years.

Simon, 49, will receive a one-time award of 1 million long- term incentive performance units that begin vesting in six years as part of the agreement, the Indianapolis-based company said Thursday in a regulatory filing. The value of the award was $120 million, based on Wednesday’s closing share price.

“David Simon is widely recognized as the leading CEO in our industry and one of the top executives in corporate America,” Simon Property said in an e-mailed statement. “The board believes it is in the best interest of SPG shareholders to secure Mr. Simon’s continued service as CEO for at least the next eight years through this equity-based retention plan with long-term vesting.”

The employment agreement was signed Wednesday and runs through July 5, 2019, according to the company. Simon has been CEO of the real estate investment trust since 1995.

As IBJ reported in May, Simon Property's executive pay outclassed other Hoosier public companies in 2010. Using a new system of long-term stock awards, the company boosted total compensation by roughly fivefold for each of its top five executives.

David Simon received a pay package of cash, stock and perks valued at $24.6 million, topping all other Indiana executives. About $13.3 million came in the form of stock awards that will pay out only if Simon achieves certain targets in the future. The same is true for Simon’s other top brass.

Still, the compensation committee of Simon’s board said then that it was working on a long-term compensation package for the CEO, who members believe was underpaid relative to his peers.

“David Simon has been widely recognized as the best and most effective chief executive in an extremely competitive industry and one of the top chief executives in corporate America,” the six-member compensation committee gushed in the company’s proxy statement, released in April.

“The committee has considered for several years that David Simon’s compensation has not been commensurate with his contributions to our success and creation of long-term stockholder value.”

Simon’s stock has been hot indeed. It gained 28.5 percent last year and has since risen another 22 percent. And even after a sharp decline in late 2008 and 2009, Simon’s shares are now above their value at the end of 2007.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • What a relief!
    I hate to think of this guy working so hard, but not having enough money to buy that ninth luxury automobile or seventh vacation home.
  • Good
    That is actually a great deal. David, now it's your turn.

    Indianapolis

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT