UPDATE: Simon shares climb after profit beats estimates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc., the largest U.S. shopping-mall owner, saw its stock make its biggest climb in more than three months Friday morning after the company announced fourth-quarter profit and a 2010 forecast that exceeded analysts’ estimates.

The shares rallied 4.9 percent, to $72.85 at 10:43 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. They rose as much as 5.6 percent earlier, the biggest intraday advance since Oct. 29.

“It beat the pants off my estimate,” said Alexander Goldfarb, an analyst at Sandler O’Neill & Partners in New York. “It’s a function of Simon having good, productive centers where retailers want to locate.”

The company raised its average rent per square foot at both regional malls and outlet centers even as U.S. consumer spending flagged. Retail spending excluding automobiles fell 0.2 percent in December, while Simon said it raised mall rents about 1.4 percent and boosted outlet rents nearly 21 percent. In December, the company agreed to buy Prime Outlets Acquisition Co. for $2.33 billion.

Simon responded to a slumping U.S. economy by raising money through stock-and-debt offerings. The company and partner Ivanhoe Cambridge Inc. said today they will sell their stake in seven malls in Poland and France for $981 million.

Simon had adjusted funds from operations of $573 million, or $1.66 a share, for the fourth quarter, the company said. Analysts expected FFO of $1.52, the average of 15 estimates in a Bloomberg survey.

Adjusted FFO excluded an $88.1 million impairment charge. Including that cost, funds from operations fell to $485.2 million, or $1.40 a share, from $540.5 million, or $1.86, a year earlier.

Simon forecast 2010 adjusted FFO of $5.72 to 5.87 a share. The average analyst estimate is for FFO of $5.59 a share.

FFO is net income excluding interest, depreciation and other gains and losses. It doesn’t comply with generally accepted accounting principles.

Quarterly revenue remained flat at about $1 billion, put profit fell 41 percent, from $196.4 million to $115.9 million.

About 92.1 percent of the regional malls the Simon operates were occupied, nearly flat with the 92.4-percent occupancy rate from a year ago. About 98 percent of its premium outlet centers were occupied, from 98.9 percent last year.

For the year, FFO fell 6 percent to $1.75 billion, or $5.33 per share, from $1.85 billion, or $6.42 per share last year.

Simon Property Group issued 52.1 million shares through public offerings and dividends in 2009. The impact to FFO per share was 22 cents for the quarter and 57 cents for the year, and the impact to net income per share was 10 cents for the quarter and 21 cents for the year. Net income per share was also hurt by 9 cents for the quarter and the year due to losses on the sale of assets.

Simon declared a dividend of 60 cents, payable on Feb. 26, to shareholders of record as of Feb. 16. The company said it would return to an all-cash dividend after paying partly in stock during 2009..

- Associated Press contributed to this story


  • Give Simon A Break
    David Simon was recently recognized as one of the most successful CEO's in the world based upon his stellar shareholder returns over the past decade in a Harvard CEO study.

    He has raised significant amounts of capital in a bad market and has reduced debt while selling the European holdings to expand in the growing Asia market and take advantage of consolidation opportunities in America.

    Simon is a long term buy.
  • Exactly
    David is correct. mn I would stay miles away from this stock. they are headed for trouble. Their mid-level corporate management, particularly for retail property operations, is recognized as very inferior to most of the industry peers. This will take its toll in sub-performing properties in the near future.
  • Exactly
    David is correct. mn I would stay miles away from this stock. they are headed for trouble. Their mid-level corporate management, particularly for retail property operations, is recognized as very inferior to most of the industry peers. This will take its toll in sub-performing properties in the near future.
  • In trouble
    Actually, you will see later this year that Simon is headed into real trouble with the new properties they recently puruchased. There are some real dogs they will need to unload or thier profit picture for 2010 will not look good to say the least.
    • Simon did not suspend its dividend last year
      To print that is incorrect and/or misleading. Simon has never suspended its dividend.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

    2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

    3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

    4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

    5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!