MARCUS: Economic slump inspires platitudes galore

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Morton Marcus

In a private room of a restaurant at lunchtime, a dozen self-anointed economic experts gather. They drink and talk.

“Well,” says the stout woman in a Hillary-inspired suit. “I may not be an economist, but I can tell you that this stimulus package will not work. Spending money is never the answer.”

“Right,” replies the lean woman in a Michelle-inspired dress. “I’m surely no economist, but I know America is not globally competitive. We need to lower taxes and create a more business-friendly environment.”

“Above all,” says a distinguished-looking man wearing Sarah-styled spectacles, “we must cut outrageous wages and benefits. This new, higher minimum wage will only result in more outsourcing and more unemployment.”

“Hmm,” I say to myself, “these people know a litany of complaints but not the reality of our economy. If the problem is that consumers and businesses are not spending because banks aren’t lending, then government making it easier for banks to lend and consumers to spend is a good thing. The stimulus plan is right on target.

“And,” I continue in conversation with my gin and tonic, “the U.S. does not have high taxes relative to what we get for those taxes nor are we burdened with excessive regulation. In fact, an argument could be made that our taxes are too low, our services inadequate, and our businesses insufficiently regulated.”

“I tell you,” says a young professorial type, “our current standard of living can no longer be justified given our collective productivity. We must return to the free market with fewer controls so that more jobs can be created here.”

“Well-said, young fellow,” bellows a pillar of the community. “Drop around to my foundation and let’s see if we can get you a grant to flesh out your ideas.”

“Flush out would be more like it,” I say to myself. “Collective productivity is a great phrase. What’s the productivity of casinos, whether they are in Las Vegas or on Wall Street? How many executives, sports figures, or professors have proven productivity that validates their wages? Just how free is the free market when most industries have substantial barriers to entry?”

“Inflation,” says the stout woman.

“Debt,” says the lean woman.

“Deflation,” says the distinguished-looking gentleman.

“All that and stagnation,” says the professorial guy.

“Socialism,” says the community pillar.

“Yet we must do something sensible about health care,” admits the stout woman.

“Our infrastructure needs to be modernized,” the lean woman says.

“The environment demands our attention,” says the distinguished man.

“Much improvement is needed in education and retraining,” the professorial guy announces.

“My concern is the future of my children,” the lean woman says. “How will they do in the global economy unless they learn more in the classroom?”

“I’m worried about protecting my savings for my retirement,” the stout woman confides, “because health care costs could eat up everything I have.”

“If we have another stock market crash, there won’t be any value to your retirement savings,” the lean woman says.

“Only the free market can give us the solutions we need,” the pillar says. “That’s why I say, ‘Let’s look back to our best times—the late 19th century—when we had tariffs to protect our industry and little government regulation. The unions were insignificant and America was a magnet for capital investment.”

“Careful now,” says the professorial chap. “We can’t have the flood of immigrants that we had then. In the late 1800s, America had booming industries and plenty of resources to absorb foreign labor, but today is another story.”

“Energy independence,” declares the distinguished gentleman.

I drift toward the bar for a refill. A nation that settles for platitudes rather than pursuing policies is in deep trouble.•


Marcus taught economics for more than 30 years at Indiana University and is the former director of IU’s Business Research Center. His column appears weekly. He can be reached at mmarcus@ibj.com.             



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.