EDITORIAL: Start over to fix Indianapolis schools

 IBJ Staff
June 16, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Change is hard. We get that. But sometimes, it’s necessary.

This is one of those times.

We’ll put it as simply—and bluntly—as possible: Indianapolis Public Schools is broken, and drastic changes are the only way to fix it. The status quo simply isn’t acceptable anymore.

Local education-reform group The Mind Trust is leading the charge for an IPS overhaul, calling for its elected school board to be replaced by a governing body appointed by the Indianapolis mayor and City-County Council.

As IBJ’s J.K. Wall reported last week, mayoral control of schools is nothing new. Cities such as Boston, Chicago, New York and Washington, D.C., for example, have taken the bold step and saw students’ test scores rise—albeit modestly.

Still, critics of the idea abound. One of them, to no surprise, is IPS Superintendent Eugene White, a once-promising educator who has turned into an unabashed IPS apologist.

“I don’t know of one [example of mayoral control] that I could point to that would be more successful than what we’re currently doing in Indianapolis,” he told IBJ, predicting that the Legislature will balk at giving city leaders such powers.

If that’s true, we’re in trouble.

Although IPS has made some improvements—increasing its graduation rate from 46 percent to 65 percent over the past five years, for instance—a school district where fewer than half the students pass state-standardized tests isn’t getting the job done. White should be willing to do whatever it takes to fix the problem. Instead, he is cheering on mediocrity.

Sure, mayoral control of schools isn’t a panacea. It didn’t work in Detroit or Cleveland. And just changing the name at the top of an organizational chart won’t make much of a difference. But The Mind Trust’s scorched-earth approach isn’t about trading one bureaucracy for another. It is a way to overcome a natural aversion to much-needed change and welcome new ideas.

The group recommends decentralizing school operations and streamlining IPS’ bloated administrative staff, freeing $188 million a year that could be used to pay outstanding teachers and fund universal preschool. Why hasn’t that happened already? For the same reason corporate executives get performance bonuses even as rank-and-file workers lose their jobs. It’s good to be the boss.

White and other opponents of mayoral control say appointing a board would disenfranchise the public by denying them a vote. But it seems to us that having the buck stop on the desk of an elected mayor would actually increase accountability, given the historically low interest in—and turnout for—school board elections.

Politics complicates matters, to be sure. We can think of no other reason that Mayor Greg Ballard still has not declared a clear position on the idea more than a year after it became public. But this isn’t a topic we can afford to discuss much longer.

Something needs to change. Our city’s future depends on it.•


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.