State GOP leader: No Mourdock sanctions before primary

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indiana Republican Party leader investigating how Senate candidate Richard Mourdock's campaign used a party database said Thursday he won't face any possible party sanctions before the May 8 primary.

Jennifer Ping said Mourdock campaign manager Jim Holden likely violated a user agreement with the state party when he shared a logon to the database with an outside vendor. The party immediately caught the violation and locked the Mourdock campaign out of the database, said Ping, who chairs the party's technology and communication committee.

The tea-party backed Mourdock is in a tight race with U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar and has steadily closed the gap on Lugar in the run-up to the Republican primary.

The state party's central committee voted unanimously Wednesday to not respond until after the primary, although Ping said it's unclear what sanctions the party could levy. Ping said when she presented the information to other party leaders Wednesday she was purposefully vague because she didn't want to be seen as tilting the race to either Lugar or Mourdock.

"I tried very hard to make it not be about Mourdock and Lugar," Ping told the Associated Press Thursday.

The state party's Salesforce database is a key tool that Republican candidates use to contact supporters and raise money. Mourdock was shut out of the database after his campaign manager wrote a March 14 email asking a campaign staffer and campaign consultants to "pillage" the database.

"We have a Salesforce login again. Can one of you guys login immediately and start pillaging email addresses like a Viking raider attacking a monastery full of unarmed monks?" Holden wrote in the email sent to members of The Prosper Group, an Indianapolis consultant advising the Mourdock campaign.

In the email, obtained by the Associated Press, he also instructed them to take the information, "download into our house file" and remove duplicate entries.

A Mourdock spokesman initially called the "pillage" email a "joke" when it was first reported Wednesday. He said Thursday the campaign's lockout from the party database has not slowed its momentum.

"Our grass-roots organization and large volunteer base have been preparing for our get-out-the-vote activities for the past 12 months. We will be ready come May 8," Mourdock spokesman Chris Conner said.

The state party easily caught Holden's attempt to share access to the database with outside vendors when he accidentally included the party's technology director on the "pillage" email, Ping said.

"Interestingly, the other thing he did, he also copied the e-director (Jeff Coats) on that email," Ping said with a laugh. "It's completely crazy."

The party is also looking into whether Mourdock supporters tampered with information on Lugar supporters in the database early last year while it had access via an account assigned to Mourdock's 2010 campaign for treasurer, Ping said.

"I have a concern their might have been misuse of access through their treasurer's campaign account to Lugar information a year ago," Ping said. She noted that different campaigns get different levels of access to the database and different files depending on what office they're seeking.

Conner said the campaign has not had access to the database since 2010 and denied any wrongdoing.

"Neither the campaign nor its vendors had access to Salesforce and did not tamper with information about Lugar supporters," he said.

The Lugar campaign and it's surrogates seized on the news Wednesday and Thursday. Former Party Chairman Jim Kittle, a Lugar supporter, called the attempt to "pillage" the database a "security breach" within the party.

Kittle equated it to one company trying to steal another company's client list, and played on the graphic language in Holden's email.

"That's rape, robbery and pillaging," Kittle said. "I'm glad he at least said monks and not nuns."


  • crooks
    So the teapublicans are ok with their boy and his campaign being cheaters? If you don't hold your own accountable, how would you expect them to act once elected? If your candidates and their advisors are committing immoral acts before elected, why would you expect anything but more of it once elected?
    Tired of the republican lies...
  • Not sur[rised
    Why am I not surprised? Mitch Daniels brought back all of the corruption of the former Bush Administration, and the state and city of Indianapolis has experienced the same partisan and non accountable form of government since then. I am not the least bit shocked or dismayed that he is going to receive 'special treatment,' just as Rumsfeld, Cheney, and the rest of the corrupt federal government did.. they should all be doing prison time for the way they recklessly and untruthfully ran our country. Daniels has carried on that same mindset in this state. Bush would be proud of 'his man Mitch.' Herr Daniels learned well from Herr Bush.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.