IBJNews

State GOP leader: No Mourdock sanctions before primary

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An Indiana Republican Party leader investigating how Senate candidate Richard Mourdock's campaign used a party database said Thursday he won't face any possible party sanctions before the May 8 primary.

Jennifer Ping said Mourdock campaign manager Jim Holden likely violated a user agreement with the state party when he shared a logon to the database with an outside vendor. The party immediately caught the violation and locked the Mourdock campaign out of the database, said Ping, who chairs the party's technology and communication committee.

The tea-party backed Mourdock is in a tight race with U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar and has steadily closed the gap on Lugar in the run-up to the Republican primary.

The state party's central committee voted unanimously Wednesday to not respond until after the primary, although Ping said it's unclear what sanctions the party could levy. Ping said when she presented the information to other party leaders Wednesday she was purposefully vague because she didn't want to be seen as tilting the race to either Lugar or Mourdock.

"I tried very hard to make it not be about Mourdock and Lugar," Ping told the Associated Press Thursday.

The state party's Salesforce database is a key tool that Republican candidates use to contact supporters and raise money. Mourdock was shut out of the database after his campaign manager wrote a March 14 email asking a campaign staffer and campaign consultants to "pillage" the database.

"We have a Salesforce login again. Can one of you guys login immediately and start pillaging email addresses like a Viking raider attacking a monastery full of unarmed monks?" Holden wrote in the email sent to members of The Prosper Group, an Indianapolis consultant advising the Mourdock campaign.

In the email, obtained by the Associated Press, he also instructed them to take the information, "download into our house file" and remove duplicate entries.

A Mourdock spokesman initially called the "pillage" email a "joke" when it was first reported Wednesday. He said Thursday the campaign's lockout from the party database has not slowed its momentum.

"Our grass-roots organization and large volunteer base have been preparing for our get-out-the-vote activities for the past 12 months. We will be ready come May 8," Mourdock spokesman Chris Conner said.

The state party easily caught Holden's attempt to share access to the database with outside vendors when he accidentally included the party's technology director on the "pillage" email, Ping said.

"Interestingly, the other thing he did, he also copied the e-director (Jeff Coats) on that email," Ping said with a laugh. "It's completely crazy."

The party is also looking into whether Mourdock supporters tampered with information on Lugar supporters in the database early last year while it had access via an account assigned to Mourdock's 2010 campaign for treasurer, Ping said.

"I have a concern their might have been misuse of access through their treasurer's campaign account to Lugar information a year ago," Ping said. She noted that different campaigns get different levels of access to the database and different files depending on what office they're seeking.

Conner said the campaign has not had access to the database since 2010 and denied any wrongdoing.

"Neither the campaign nor its vendors had access to Salesforce and did not tamper with information about Lugar supporters," he said.

The Lugar campaign and it's surrogates seized on the news Wednesday and Thursday. Former Party Chairman Jim Kittle, a Lugar supporter, called the attempt to "pillage" the database a "security breach" within the party.

Kittle equated it to one company trying to steal another company's client list, and played on the graphic language in Holden's email.

"That's rape, robbery and pillaging," Kittle said. "I'm glad he at least said monks and not nuns."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • crooks
    So the teapublicans are ok with their boy and his campaign being cheaters? If you don't hold your own accountable, how would you expect them to act once elected? If your candidates and their advisors are committing immoral acts before elected, why would you expect anything but more of it once elected?
    Tired of the republican lies...
  • Not sur[rised
    Why am I not surprised? Mitch Daniels brought back all of the corruption of the former Bush Administration, and the state and city of Indianapolis has experienced the same partisan and non accountable form of government since then. I am not the least bit shocked or dismayed that he is going to receive 'special treatment,' just as Rumsfeld, Cheney, and the rest of the corrupt federal government did.. they should all be doing prison time for the way they recklessly and untruthfully ran our country. Daniels has carried on that same mindset in this state. Bush would be proud of 'his man Mitch.' Herr Daniels learned well from Herr Bush.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT