IBJNews

State lawyer calls IBM bid to depose Daniels 'meritless'

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

If Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels can promote his book and lead a motorcycle tour, he isn't too busy to testify about his decision to cancel a contract with IBM Corp. to automate welfare applications, the technology giant contends in a court filing.

Armonk, N.Y.-based IBM has sued over the dismissal of a $1.37 billion state contract. Judge David Dreyer ruled in April that Daniels need not testify then, but left open the possibility he might be ordered to later.

The 23-page motion filed Tuesday asks that the governor be compelled to testify, and it suggests he has the time. IBM points out that Daniels led 500 motorcyclists on a trip through southern Indiana on Aug. 12, an event that raised money for the Indiana National Guard Relief Fund.

Daniels also made at least seven appearances on national television in August, mostly to talk about the 2012 presidential campaign, his job as governor and his new book, "Keeping the Republic."

"Recent events further confirm that the primary excuse the state has offered in resisting the governor's deposition — that he is 'too busy' to testify in this case — is meritless," IBM's motion argues.

Peter Rusthoven, an attorney for the state, said in an e-mail message that it was IBM's bid to depose the governor that is "meritless." He said there would be a legal response but didn't provide details.

IBM's motion argues Daniels has unique, firsthand information unavailable elsewhere. It contends his testimony is "essential" because he was the "chief player" for the state in designing Indiana's automated welfare application system and the efforts to fix it when it ran into problems. Among them was lost documents, long call center hold times, and bungled face-to-face appointments for welfare clients to meet with case workers.

The filing also presents a new scenario for IBM's dismissal: It says Daniels wanted IBM to change direction and implement what would later become known as the "hybrid system" that combined the automation with more face-to-face contact with case workers, but the company said that would cost Indiana more money.

The money the state saved by firing IBM is being used to finance the hybrid system currently being rolled out across Indiana, the motion said.

IBM spokesman Clint Roswell noted FSSA Secretary Michael Gargano told lawmakers last month that 59 percent of new welfare applications were being submitted online.

"The state's dirty little secret about Indiana's newfound success with managing its online, more accessible, hybrid welfare system is that it's using IBM technology to make it happen," Roswell said.

Judge Dreyer's April ruling said IBM had not presented enough evidence to overcome a state law protecting certain state officials from testifying in lawsuits, but the order noted that he could be required to testify under conditions that had not been met at that time.

The case is currently scheduled to go to trial in February.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Barnes & Thornburg
    How could the writer write this story and not even mention that Peter Rusthoven is from the firm Barnes & Thornburg which also represents ACS, the lead subcontractor in the FSSA privatizaton fiasco? Barnes is representing the State to the tune of several millions of dollars while in fact one of the companies they should be suing is their own client, ACS. You think Barnes might work to protect ACS during the course of representing the State. This is an obvious conflict of interest under the ethics rules.
  • Something looks fishy...
    If the state used IBM's technology, then they should pay for it. I wouldn't care what some state attorney says because IBM attorneys are going to tear him apart lol. I didn't know Daniels had more important matters to attend than a $1.37 state contract. If Daniels is wrong, the state is going to have to pay that plus enormous attorney fees. Why does Daniels think this isn't important to attend? Unless he has something to hide of course.
  • Problem
    What's Mitch's problem, handle the deposition and get on with your life. Your not "above" the rest of us. Arrogance or guilt?????????

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
ADVERTISEMENT