IBJNews

State lobbying commission sidelines executive director

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Lobby Registration Commission placed its executive director and general counsel on paid leave Monday, the day before a busy filing day for the state's lobbyists.

Sarah Nagy, who has held the dual jobs for 14 years, said she was surprised to receive an e-mail on Martin Luther King Jr. Day notifying her that she was on administrative leave. She has since retained Indianapolis employment-law attorney Kevin Betz.

"I can't really comment on my administrative leave because I don't really understand it," she said. "I'm a little surprised by it, actually."

Nagy said she was hospitalized earlier this month for lupus-related complications and over the weekend submitted paperwork for a partial medical leave, but she said her current status is not voluntary. She'd intended to be in the office Tuesday to answer questions and receive paperwork from lobbyists as they met the annual registration deadline.

The commission sidelined Nagy after a trying period in which she and lobbyists struggled to interpret the ethics law passed in 2010 ahead of the General Assembly's current session. The law lowered the threshold at which lobbyists must report their spending, from $100 to $50, and banned them from taking leglislators on out-of-state junkets.

Other aspects of the law were confusing, Nagy said, and the commission needed to offer its interpretation before she could generate new forms and explain to lobbyists how to report their activity. One lobbyist, who declined to be named, agreed that the new rules were confusing but said the lack of guidance from Nagy was frustrating.

"I'm not authorized to act independent of the full commission," Nagy said. "So I empathize with every one of them," she said of the frustrated lobbyists.

Nagy said she had urged the commission to hold more meetings between Sept. 30 and a Nov. 1 deadline, but past Chairwoman Jan Abbs declined. The commission convened on Dec. 10 and finally settled some lingering questions, she said.

Abbs could not be reached for comment late Tuesday. Sue Scholer, who became chairwoman of the four-member board this year, declined to comment on what prompted Nagy's leave. "It was just an action that was taken by the commission," she said.

Commission member Scott Mellinger also declined to comment, citing a confidential personnel matter. He said Chuck Harris, a retired Ivy Tech Community College executive, would fill in for Nagy until her employment status is resolved.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT