IBJNews

State museum uncovers hidden Steele painting

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana State Museum has just discovered a painting by famous Hoosier artist T.C. Steele that, oddly, has been in its possession for more than 65 years, museum officials announced Wednesday.

The unusual find occurred when the museum, which boasts the largest collection of Steele paintings in the country, shipped one of the late Indiana artist’s works to suburban Chicago to be cleaned by an art conservator.

After taking the canvas painting, titled “The Old Garden,” off its frame to be restretched, conservator Barry Bauman found, to his amazement, another painting directly beneath it.

“It was like a King Tut discovery, for me,” he said. “I’ve been conserving paintings for 40 years, and it’s never happened to me. I’ve never heard of it happening to any other conservator. That’s how unique this is.”

Museum officials unveiled the painting privately to major donors on Monday evening before taking it to Steele’s former home and studio in bucolic Brown County south of Indianapolis for a public showing Wednesday afternoon.

Steele, who died in 1926 at the age of 78, was an American Impressionist painter known for his Indiana landscapes. He is considered the most important of a cluster of Indiana artists known as The Hoosier Group.

His second wife, Selma Neubacher Steele, donated more than 300 of Steele’s works to the state of Indiana shortly before her death in 1945.

The painting is dated 1890 and is a landscape piece, depicting a couple of buildings and a clock tower. A small, female figure wearing a red bonnet could be Steele’s daughter, Daisy, who was featured in a few of Steele's paintings, said Kathi Moore, the museum’s communications director.

The museum is trying to determine the location of the painting.

“No one has been able to identify those buildings,” Moore said, “so it’s kind of a mystery.”

Curt Churchman, a collector of Indiana art who operates Fine Estate Art & Rugs in Broad Ripple, said an 18-inch-by-24-inch painting by Steele from that time would probably bring $50,000 to $100,000 if it were sold on the open market.

“It’s a good period for Steele," said Churchman, who sold a Steele painting last year for $75,000. “He was at the top of his form.”

Steele had returned from Munich in 1885, five years before finishing the newly discovered painting, and was working in Indianapolis between sojourns to Indiana communities such as Brookville, Metamora, Spencer and Vernon.

What’s more unusual about the painting, however, is that it’s dated three years later (1890) than the one (1887) that was covering it.
 
“Initially you think, this is impossible—why would an artist cover one of his paintings?” Bauman said. “He may have put two paintings on one stretcher to conserve them. You just don’t know.”

Bauman, a former associate conservator for the Art Institute of Chicago, has been restoring paintings without charge the past nine years and has finished 60 for the state museum.

The Steele painting has not been known to exist at least for the past 86 years. His widow authenticated his paintings after his death and unknowingly authenticated the back of the “new” painting, identifying it as “The Old Garden” stretched over the top.

Experts say it’s doubtful she knew there were two canvasses on the stretcher.

“I was just completely taken aback when I saw what I had discovered,” Bauman said. “For the museum to have another acquisition like this is just incredible.”

The museum has yet to name the painting.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Better than Vonnegut
    I know it is all the rage to feature Kurt Vonnegut as the archetype for Indiana creativity, but his penchant for signing his name as a sphincter leaves me thinking that T.C. Steele is a MUCH better figure to promote for emulation to our children. Love the idea of rotating Steele's work thru the schools.
  • Aweikert@gmail.com
    James,
    This article clearly states that this piece belongs to the ISM not the IMA. I'm sure it was an honest mistake but one that unfortunately happens all too often to the ISM.
    Congratulations on your good fortune ISM.
  • connect it to history
    I believe it is true that Steele's wife was once the superintendent of the Indianapolis Public Schools, when he was actively painting. And also that because of this some of our schools own and exhibit a Steele painting. I think (of course this idea is too late until the fall term) that the painting could travel to some of the schools for a special lesson/exhibition in art/history and let each school's students then submit an appropriate name for the painting, from which the museum could choose. When displayed at the museum, the school's name could also be displayed as the namer. So some rich person doesn't get to name it after his kid or car or something.
  • Let the community name the painting
    I think it would be an incredible fundraiser to let individuals submit names for the painting for a donation (pay per vote) or to get a major donor to make a on-time donation in exchange for the right to name the painting - and help support IMA.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT