IBJNews

State parks see surge in business as weather heats up

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Expect state parks to be a little busier this summer.

Sales of annual passes shot up in May after a slow start to the year because of a harsh winter.

Revenue from year-long passes was up about 8 percent this year through the end of May compared to the same time last year, according to the Indiana Department of Natural Resources. That amounted to about $1.74 million for the state agency despite fees staying at $40.

The boost has DNR officials expecting more people to visit parks this summer. However, annual passes are only one piece of a more complex system for forecasting attendance, Sorrells added.

“Annual permits are a part of the formula we use to estimate our annual attendance,” Christie Sorrells, business services program director for the DNR’s parks and reservoirs division, said in an e-mail. “So, theoretically, if the annual entrance permit revenue is up, then we would expect the number of visits to be up.”

One-day admissions are also up by 20 percent over last year, as they reeled in about $1.06 million between January and May.

The spike happened much more suddenly this year after unusually cold weather lasted well into spring.

“Within the last 4 to 6 weeks, we have more than made up for [a slow start], thanks in large part to some fantastic weekends of weather,” Sorrells said.

Despite increasing from 2013, revenue from daily passes is down from the first five months of 2012, when uncommonly warm weather drove sales up to $1.1 million. Annual passes, which in 2012 cost $4 less than they do now, brought in $1.59 million.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT