IBJNews

State unemployment rate dips to 9.1 percent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana’s unemployment rate declined again, dropping to 9.1 percent in January, the Indiana Department of Workforce Development said Thursday morning.

The state’s jobless rate hasn’t been that low since January 2009. Only Nevada saw a greater decline in the rate.

Indiana’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 9.5 percent in December, 9.8 percent in November, 9.9 percent in October and 10.1 percent in September. The rate topped out at 10.2 percent last year in July and August.

“2011 is off to a good start with strong employment gains,” DWD Commissioner Mark W. Everson said in a prepared statement. “We’ve seen increases in almost all areas of employment.”

The state added 10,600 private-sector jobs in January after losing 9,100 of those jobs in December, the report said.

Sectors showing growth included construction, trade transportation and utilities, manufacturing and financial activities.

Sectors with declines included professional and business services, and private education and health services.

The national unemployment rate sank to 9 percent in January and to 8.9 percent in February, down from 9.4 percent in December.

Indiana is set to report February unemployment numbers March 25.

In the Midwest, only Kentucky reported an increase in unemployment in January. Illinois’ rate was 9 percent, followed by Ohio at 9.4 percent, Kentucky at 10.4 percent and Michigan at 10.7 percent.

Despite the decreasing rate, the number of unemployed Hoosiers rose to 294,580 in January, from a revised 283,803 in December.

In the Indianapolis metropolitan area, the non-seasonally adjusted jobless rate was 8.7 percent in January, up from 8.4 percent in December but down from 10 percent in January 2010.

Comparisons of metro areas are most accurately made using the same months in prior years, because the government does not adjust the figures for factory furloughs and other seasonal fluctuations.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • See!
    Nothing to scratch heads about.We start talking about checking mexicans for proper identification like Arizona and they quietly begin leaving.That opens up jobs which LEGAL persons get = unemployment goes down.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT