School voucher program draws early interest

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

About 385 families have requested state tuition assistance at private schools since July 11, when the Indiana Department of Education started accepting applications for its new voucher program.

The DOE is in the process of sending acceptance letters to those families, said spokesman Alex Damron.

Legislators passed a law enabling vouchers this year, allowing students from low- and middle-income families to seek state funds to help pay the cost of attending private schools. 

Students must select the private school they want to attend from a list of state-approved schools, Damron said. More than 125 schools have applied to participate in the voucher program, and most have been accepted.

Schools apply for a voucher on the student’s behalf, using some information provided by parents. Money goes directly from the state to the school with parent authorization to disburse it.

“We’re encouraged so many families have reached out during the first week of the student application process,” Damron said, adding that the number of schools participating will provide families with a wide variety of options.

The state’s voucher law—the broadest in the nation—has drawn the ire of groups such as teachers unions and Indiana House Democrats, who cited the measure as one of the reasons behind their five-week Statehouse walkout last session. Among their biggest beefs is that the law transfers public funds to some schools with religious affiliations.

Many of the roughly 117 schools already on the state’s voucher list have a religious affiliation.

Last month, a group that included members of the Indiana State Teachers Association, as well as teachers, school administrators and some clergy, filed a lawsuit seeking to block the law, saying it violates the state’s Constitution.

Through the law, the state will provide tuition assistance equal to a percentage of the money a public school district would have spent on educating the student: 90 percent of the district’s per-pupil expenditure for families of four making $41,000, and 50 percent for families of four earning about $61,000.

Spending is capped at $4,500 per year for students in first through eighth grades.

Damron said there is no deadline for schools or students to apply for the program, though the number of participants will be capped at 7,500 students this year.

Students who enter the program later in the school year will receive assistance that is based on a pro-rated amount of state funding.


  • religious schools
    Francesca, do you know the status of the lawsuit? Obviously there are some of us who believe this is a violation of the separation of church and state.
  • I would then argue
    If you want to send your kids to a religion based school - pay the tuition. Simple as that.
  • Constitution
    I would argue taking my money and then telling me I can not use it at a school based on religion is un-constitutional.

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
  • Constitution?
    This line says it all: "Many of the roughly 117 schools already on the state’s voucher list have a religious affiliation."

    Since when did it become legal to use taxpayer money to subsidize any religious organization!?!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

    2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

    3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

    4. Exciting times in Carmel.

    5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1