School voucher program draws early interest

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

About 385 families have requested state tuition assistance at private schools since July 11, when the Indiana Department of Education started accepting applications for its new voucher program.

The DOE is in the process of sending acceptance letters to those families, said spokesman Alex Damron.

Legislators passed a law enabling vouchers this year, allowing students from low- and middle-income families to seek state funds to help pay the cost of attending private schools. 

Students must select the private school they want to attend from a list of state-approved schools, Damron said. More than 125 schools have applied to participate in the voucher program, and most have been accepted.

Schools apply for a voucher on the student’s behalf, using some information provided by parents. Money goes directly from the state to the school with parent authorization to disburse it.

“We’re encouraged so many families have reached out during the first week of the student application process,” Damron said, adding that the number of schools participating will provide families with a wide variety of options.

The state’s voucher law—the broadest in the nation—has drawn the ire of groups such as teachers unions and Indiana House Democrats, who cited the measure as one of the reasons behind their five-week Statehouse walkout last session. Among their biggest beefs is that the law transfers public funds to some schools with religious affiliations.

Many of the roughly 117 schools already on the state’s voucher list have a religious affiliation.

Last month, a group that included members of the Indiana State Teachers Association, as well as teachers, school administrators and some clergy, filed a lawsuit seeking to block the law, saying it violates the state’s Constitution.

Through the law, the state will provide tuition assistance equal to a percentage of the money a public school district would have spent on educating the student: 90 percent of the district’s per-pupil expenditure for families of four making $41,000, and 50 percent for families of four earning about $61,000.

Spending is capped at $4,500 per year for students in first through eighth grades.

Damron said there is no deadline for schools or students to apply for the program, though the number of participants will be capped at 7,500 students this year.

Students who enter the program later in the school year will receive assistance that is based on a pro-rated amount of state funding.


  • religious schools
    Francesca, do you know the status of the lawsuit? Obviously there are some of us who believe this is a violation of the separation of church and state.
  • I would then argue
    If you want to send your kids to a religion based school - pay the tuition. Simple as that.
  • Constitution
    I would argue taking my money and then telling me I can not use it at a school based on religion is un-constitutional.

    "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;"
  • Constitution?
    This line says it all: "Many of the roughly 117 schools already on the state’s voucher list have a religious affiliation."

    Since when did it become legal to use taxpayer money to subsidize any religious organization!?!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

    2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

    3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

    4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

    5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim