IBJNews

State's unemployment rate drops to 8 percent

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana’s unemployment rate fell for the second straight month in October, to 8 percent.

The Indiana Department of Workforce Development said Tuesday morning that the rate decreased from 8.2 percent in September and 8.3 percent in August. The rate was 9.1 percent in October 2011.

The state added 7,700 private-sector jobs in October, marking the largest monthly gain since May, the department said.

“Over the past year Indiana has experienced one of the strongest periods of job growth in over a decade,” DWD Commissioner Scott B. Sanders said. “Since last October, we have added nearly 67,000 private-sector jobs and continue to significantly outpace the national rate of growth.”

The October rate was higher than the national rate of 7.9 percent, but lower than all neighboring states except for Ohio, which saw unemployment fall to 6.9 percent.

Indiana’s jobless rate has been at 8 percent or above in all but two months since December 2008.

Statewide non-farm employment in October totaled just under 3.2 million on a seasonally adjusted basis. A total of 234,740 people sought unemployment benefits, down from a revised 237,319 in September.

Job sectors showing employment gains in October included leisure and hospitality (5,200), manufacturing (3,100), and trade, transportation and utilities (2,200).

Sectors showing the biggest employment loss were professional and business services (-1,500) and financial activities (-1,100).

In the Indianapolis metro area, the non-seasonally adjusted jobless rate was 7.1 percent in October, down from 8.4 percent in October 2011. However, the area lost jobs, dropping to 891,506 in October from 910,709 a year earlier.

Comparisons of metro areas are more accurately made using the same months in prior years because the government does not adjust the figures for factory furloughs and other seasonal fluctuations.
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Is Indy area population shrinking?
    Indy metro unemployment rate has dropped from 8.4% to 7.1% while Indy metro lost 2.1% of its jobs? Expressed another way: The reported number of unemployed in the Indy metro dropped from 83,515 to 68,135. So we have 19,203 less people employed in the Indy metro at the same time that we have 15,380 less people unemployed. Thus, we have 34,583 less people in the workforce in the Indy metro. That's the real story. Is the Indy metro population decreasing or are there 35,000 more people that have given up on seeking work in the last year?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT