IBJNews

Steak n Shake facing new suit over mandatory menu pricing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Another Steak n Shake franchise owner is suing the company over its controversial practice that prohibits restaurants in the chain from setting their own menu prices, even after a federal appeals court sided with a franchisee.

St. Louis-based Druco Restaurants Inc., which operates two Steak n Shake locations in Missouri, filed suit against the locally based chain April 3 in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis.

Druco is seeking a permanent injunction to bar Steak n Shake from mandating company-wide menu prices and from terminating Druco’s franchise for refusing to comply with the pricing policy.

Druco argues that it has suffered financially because the policy prohibits franchisees from increasing menu prices while, at the same time, they’re forced to pay higher food costs resulting from a Steak n Shake distribution agreement.

Steak n Shake eliminated its own distribution operations in June 2010 and contracted with another company, Sygma, to be the single distributor of products to company-owned and franchised restaurants, significantly increasing food costs, Druco said in the filing.

“By virtue of its mandate that Sygma is the exclusive supplier of all products to franchisees, together with its policy requiring all franchisees to follow set menu pricing on every item on their menu, Steak n Shake effectively controls both the buy and sell prices for every food item sold by franchisees,” Druco argued.

Druco’s federal suit follows a similar complaint brought by fellow franchisee Stuller Inc. in November 2010.

Springfield, Ill.-based Stuller operates five Illinois Steak n Shake restaurants under franchise agreements with predecessors that date back to 1939, making it the oldest Steak n Shake franchise in the country.

A U.S. District Court in Illinois granted Stuller a preliminary injunction, similar to what Druco is seeking, to stop Steak n Shake from forcing menu prices on franchisees.

Steak n Shake appealed. But last August, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Illinois federal court’s ruling in Stuller’s favor.

In its argument, Stuller said that in 2008, after the franchise adopted Steak n Shake’s pricing policy, it lost $538,446 due to the new policy and higher fuel and food costs.

Yet, even after the Illinois court's judgment "that Steak n Shake has no material evidence to support its contention that its franchise agreements give it the right to enforce the policy, Steak n Shake has held steadfast in its ongoing, and system-wide, breach of those agreements by continuing to force its franchisees to abide by the policy,” Druco said in its complaint.

Steak n Shake is operated by San Antonio-based holding company Biglari Holdings Inc. Calls to the company seeking comment on Druco’s lawsuit were not returned.

Druco is represented locally by lawyers of Cohen & Malad LLP.

Besides asking for the injunction, Druco is suing Steak n Shake for breach of contract and fraud.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT