IBJNews

Steak n Shake facing new suit over mandatory menu pricing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Another Steak n Shake franchise owner is suing the company over its controversial practice that prohibits restaurants in the chain from setting their own menu prices, even after a federal appeals court sided with a franchisee.

St. Louis-based Druco Restaurants Inc., which operates two Steak n Shake locations in Missouri, filed suit against the locally based chain April 3 in U.S. District Court in Indianapolis.

Druco is seeking a permanent injunction to bar Steak n Shake from mandating company-wide menu prices and from terminating Druco’s franchise for refusing to comply with the pricing policy.

Druco argues that it has suffered financially because the policy prohibits franchisees from increasing menu prices while, at the same time, they’re forced to pay higher food costs resulting from a Steak n Shake distribution agreement.

Steak n Shake eliminated its own distribution operations in June 2010 and contracted with another company, Sygma, to be the single distributor of products to company-owned and franchised restaurants, significantly increasing food costs, Druco said in the filing.

“By virtue of its mandate that Sygma is the exclusive supplier of all products to franchisees, together with its policy requiring all franchisees to follow set menu pricing on every item on their menu, Steak n Shake effectively controls both the buy and sell prices for every food item sold by franchisees,” Druco argued.

Druco’s federal suit follows a similar complaint brought by fellow franchisee Stuller Inc. in November 2010.

Springfield, Ill.-based Stuller operates five Illinois Steak n Shake restaurants under franchise agreements with predecessors that date back to 1939, making it the oldest Steak n Shake franchise in the country.

A U.S. District Court in Illinois granted Stuller a preliminary injunction, similar to what Druco is seeking, to stop Steak n Shake from forcing menu prices on franchisees.

Steak n Shake appealed. But last August, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Illinois federal court’s ruling in Stuller’s favor.

In its argument, Stuller said that in 2008, after the franchise adopted Steak n Shake’s pricing policy, it lost $538,446 due to the new policy and higher fuel and food costs.

Yet, even after the Illinois court's judgment "that Steak n Shake has no material evidence to support its contention that its franchise agreements give it the right to enforce the policy, Steak n Shake has held steadfast in its ongoing, and system-wide, breach of those agreements by continuing to force its franchisees to abide by the policy,” Druco said in its complaint.

Steak n Shake is operated by San Antonio-based holding company Biglari Holdings Inc. Calls to the company seeking comment on Druco’s lawsuit were not returned.

Druco is represented locally by lawyers of Cohen & Malad LLP.

Besides asking for the injunction, Druco is suing Steak n Shake for breach of contract and fraud.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is still my favorite Mexican restaurant in town. What I do love about the new version is it is much quieter than the most recent version. TV's were off, the music wasn't too loud, and the wait staff were not hyperactive like they had been the past few times I had been there. I just wish they would bring back the MOLE for the enchiladas!

  2. Not a bad paper. There is a need for local community news and city government issues. Don't really need the owner's constant national political rants. We all know where they stand by now.

  3. What nice people. Menard should've known better than to team up with the guy who robbed and drove Conseco to ashes. I'm surprised Timothy Durham isn't involved in this.

  4. Hello, I am Maris Peters, currently living in Texas city, USA. I am a widow at the moment with three kids and i was stuck in a financial situation in August 2014 and i needed to refinance and pay my bills. I tried seeking loans from various loan Companies both private and corporate but never with success, and most banks declined my credit. But as God would have it, I was introduced to a Man of God a private loan lender who gave me a loan of $65,000USD and today am a business owner and my kids are doing well at the moment, if you must contact any firm or company with reference to securing a loan without collateral , no credit check, no co signer with just 2% interest rate and better repayment plans and schedule, please contact Mr William David. He doesn’t know that am doing this but am so happy now and i decided to let people know more about him and also i want God to bless him more.You can contact him through his email: Davidloanfirm@yahoo.com

  5. It is beyond me how anyone can think this was a "bad deal" for the state! If they could take the money back then, yes, but they can't! Protections were built in the agreement. Now, if they roll the roads up and take them away, I will agree that it was a bad deal. Otherwise, the only way to have paid for the infrastructure that was badly needed was for the state to issue bonds....that is a four letter synonym for debt folks!!

ADVERTISEMENT