IBJNews

Subaru awaiting Toyota's decision about output in Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.’s Subaru unit, which added more U.S. market share than any international carmaker last year, is pushing ahead with U.S. expansion plans as it awaits a Toyota Motor Corp. decision on whether to keep using its Indiana plant to build Camrys.

Capacity to build Subaru vehicles at Tokyo-based Fuji’s sole U.S. plant in Lafayette is on track to reach 300,000 units annually by 2016, CEO Yasuyuki Yoshinaga said Wednesday at the New York International Auto Show. The fate of the plant’s second line, which builds 100,000 Camrys a year under contract for Toyota, isn’t yet clear, he said.

“Whether or not Camry is produced in Indiana, that’s Toyota’s decision,” Yoshinaga said. “An official decision has not been made by Toyota, so we’re just waiting.”

The production issue is a curious wrinkle in the relationship between a small yet fast-growing Japanese automaker and the world’s largest car manufacturer.

Should Toyota’s production tie-up with Fuji end in 2015, after an eight-year run, the Toyota City, Japan-based automaker must have in place a new production plan to keep its North American Camry production volume near the almost 446,000-unit level of last year. Camry has been the top-selling car in the United States for the past dozen years.

U.S. demand for all-wheel-drive Subaru brand Forester crossovers and Crosstrek wagons boosted the unit's sales 26 percent last year and 21 percent in 2014’s first quarter. To keep growing in the United States, Subaru—with less than 1 million units of worldwide production capacity—last year said it would spend $400 million to increase capacity at its Indiana plant.

Discussions over keeping Camry production at the Subaru plant are continuing, Jim Lentz, Toyota’s North American chief executive, said in an interview this month. Toyota’s Georgetown, Ky., plant, its biggest in North America, is the main Camry producer, building about 350,000 last year.

“It hasn’t been finalized that it’s going, or the timing if it does happen. Those are still under discussion,” Lentz said in Santa Barbara, Calif. “They’ve got to come to a final agreement here fairly soon.”

Toyota is Fuji Heavy’s biggest shareholder, with a 16.6-percent stake.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT