IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Susan Bayh's tangled web puts cloud over senator husband

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Corporate boards need more women, but not people such as Susan Bayh, wife of Sen. Evan Bayh.

It’s not that she isn’t up to the task. The former attorney at Eli Lilly and Co. and visiting professor at Butler University is by all accounts capable. So we’re not surprised she regularly receives invitations to serve on boards.

But we are surprised she accepts. As her husband’s political career has blossomed, questions about conflicts of interest have mushroomed.

These days, Susan Bayh, 49, serves on five boards, including WellPoint Inc. and Emmis Communications Corp. locally.

You can imagine that WellPoint brass is delighted to have Bayh aboard. After all, she has the ear of a senator who is emerging as an important player as Congress considers sweeping health care reforms.

It’s a good gig for Susan Bayh. Last year, she earned $327,000 in fees, stock and stock options from WellPoint, according to IBJ research. But the hefty compensation only heightens our unease with the arrangement.

A key question: Will Sen. Bayh be less likely to play tough with health insurers because of his wife’s position?

The Bayhs never have addressed such conflict concerns head on, even though they’ve come up repeatedly.

During the question-and-answer session at WellPoint’s annual meeting in May, the topic came up twice. But CEO Angela Braly didn’t provide much of an answer.

“We feel we’re well-situated to avoid the conflict of interest that might exist from that situation,” Braly told shareholders.

Bloomberg reported last fall that Susan Bayh’s role on boards might have hurt Evan Bayh’s chances of becoming the vice presidential running mate for Barack Obama.

It isn’t just the WellPoint board post that raises sticky questions. At least one major shareholder in Emmis Communications has questioned whether Susan Bayh would be willing to be tough on CEO Jeff Smulyan, an unabashed supporter of her husband.

Smulyan is a Democrat who has held fundraisers for Bayh at his home. “I hope he one day seeks the presidency,” Smulyan said at a 2001 Democratic event. Emmis also was the publisher of Evan Bayh’s 2003 memoir.

“The well-chronicled personal relationships that Ms. Bayh and her husband have with the Emmis CEO might logically raise legitimate questions about the extent of Mrs. Bayh’s independence,” Frank Martin, an Elkhart money manager, said in a letter last year.

For her service on Emmis’ board, Susan Bayh last year earned stock and options valued at $99,262, according to IBJ research.

Radio-station operator Emmis, like WellPoint, is in a business that’s regulated by the federal government—regulation that Sen. Bayh has the influence to shape.

We don’t begrudge Susan Bayh’s desire to make a living and build her own career. But she could put her skills to work in ways that would be free of potential conflict. It’s time for her to clear the air by doing just that.•

__________


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT