SKARBECK: Tax-haven crackdown starts getting serious

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

If you never got around to opening that Swiss bank account, you might want to wait a bit longer—at least until after Sept. 23. That is the date the IRS has set for any tax-evading American to come forward regarding 52,000 accounts held at Swiss banking giant UBS under a Voluntary Disclosure program.

Switzerland has bank secrecy laws that make it a felony to improperly disclose client identities, a feature some wealthy people find appealing. Unmoved to comply with IRS demands, Swiss authorities had threatened to seize the UBS client data and withhold it from the U.S. tax agency. That is until last week, when UBS, the Swiss government and the IRS reached a pact that will reveal the identities of an estimated 10,000 or so account holders.

The threat of disclosure has some tax evaders scrambling to come clean. In one week, 400 applicants sought Foreign Bank Account Reporting forms, more than four times the number requested all last year. By complying, violators face lower civil charges as opposed to criminal charges and heavy fines.

The Wall Street Journal reported that a Swiss account holder who voluntarily comes forward with a $1 million account earning $50,000 in unreported income annually from 2003 to 2008 might result in taxes and penalties that total $386,000, according to IRS estimates. By comparison, the IRS estimates that a similar account—discovered after the deadline—might result in $2.3 million in taxes and penalties, and the possibility of criminal prosecution.

The disclosure form also asks for explanations of where the funds came from and who helped set up the account, providing the IRS with leads on outside consultants who helped arrange the tax-evasion structures.

While UBS was targeted due to a few high-profile guilty pleas, this is just the tip of the tax-haven iceberg. It has been estimated that, worldwide, more than $5 trillion in assets are held in offshore accounts. In recent months, France, Germany and the United Kingdom have been waging battle against tax havens. In April, a group of 20 industrial and developing nations agreed to end an “era of banking secrecy” by releasing a list that categorized financial centers according to their degree of cooperation with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development tax standards.

One small tax haven, the Isle of Man, has already conformed to OECD rules, which may pressure others to comply. Authorities there say that, by mid-2011, all savings income will be automatically reported. The four countries the G-20 listed as the worst offenders were Costa Rica, Malaysia, the Philippines and Uruguay. Another 38 countries and territories—including Switzerland, the Cayman Islands, Bahamas and Liechtenstein—were “gray listed” as committed to meet international tax standards, but as not having implemented them.

The United States has signaled a desire to support reform of tax havens. Hedge funds are estimated to hold $500 billion of U.S. assets in offshore accounts, with about half belonging to tax-exempt foundations, endowments and pension funds.

Reform of the tax havens is just another step needed to cleanse the financial system following years of abuse. And it is quite likely we will find there is a lot of untaxed income overseas.


Skarbeck is managing partner of Indianapolis-based Aldebaran Capital LLC, amoney management firm. His column appears every other week. Views expressedare his own. He can be reached at 818-7827 or ken@aldebarancapital.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1