IBJOpinion

SKARBECK: Tax-haven crackdown starts getting serious

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

If you never got around to opening that Swiss bank account, you might want to wait a bit longer—at least until after Sept. 23. That is the date the IRS has set for any tax-evading American to come forward regarding 52,000 accounts held at Swiss banking giant UBS under a Voluntary Disclosure program.

Switzerland has bank secrecy laws that make it a felony to improperly disclose client identities, a feature some wealthy people find appealing. Unmoved to comply with IRS demands, Swiss authorities had threatened to seize the UBS client data and withhold it from the U.S. tax agency. That is until last week, when UBS, the Swiss government and the IRS reached a pact that will reveal the identities of an estimated 10,000 or so account holders.

The threat of disclosure has some tax evaders scrambling to come clean. In one week, 400 applicants sought Foreign Bank Account Reporting forms, more than four times the number requested all last year. By complying, violators face lower civil charges as opposed to criminal charges and heavy fines.

The Wall Street Journal reported that a Swiss account holder who voluntarily comes forward with a $1 million account earning $50,000 in unreported income annually from 2003 to 2008 might result in taxes and penalties that total $386,000, according to IRS estimates. By comparison, the IRS estimates that a similar account—discovered after the deadline—might result in $2.3 million in taxes and penalties, and the possibility of criminal prosecution.

The disclosure form also asks for explanations of where the funds came from and who helped set up the account, providing the IRS with leads on outside consultants who helped arrange the tax-evasion structures.

While UBS was targeted due to a few high-profile guilty pleas, this is just the tip of the tax-haven iceberg. It has been estimated that, worldwide, more than $5 trillion in assets are held in offshore accounts. In recent months, France, Germany and the United Kingdom have been waging battle against tax havens. In April, a group of 20 industrial and developing nations agreed to end an “era of banking secrecy” by releasing a list that categorized financial centers according to their degree of cooperation with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development tax standards.

One small tax haven, the Isle of Man, has already conformed to OECD rules, which may pressure others to comply. Authorities there say that, by mid-2011, all savings income will be automatically reported. The four countries the G-20 listed as the worst offenders were Costa Rica, Malaysia, the Philippines and Uruguay. Another 38 countries and territories—including Switzerland, the Cayman Islands, Bahamas and Liechtenstein—were “gray listed” as committed to meet international tax standards, but as not having implemented them.

The United States has signaled a desire to support reform of tax havens. Hedge funds are estimated to hold $500 billion of U.S. assets in offshore accounts, with about half belonging to tax-exempt foundations, endowments and pension funds.

Reform of the tax havens is just another step needed to cleanse the financial system following years of abuse. And it is quite likely we will find there is a lot of untaxed income overseas.

––––––––––

Skarbeck is managing partner of Indianapolis-based Aldebaran Capital LLC, amoney management firm. His column appears every other week. Views expressedare his own. He can be reached at 818-7827 or ken@aldebarancapital.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT