IBJNews

Taxi cab drivers file suit against Town of Speedway

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Speedway police improperly seized the licenses of as many as 80 cab drivers on the day of the Indianapolis 500 and later charged them $50 each for their return, according to a federal lawsuit filed against the town.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana and attorneys representing three cab drivers filed the suit Monday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana. The suit seeks class-action status to include all drivers affected by the officers’ alleged actions.

The lawsuit, which contends that officers violated the cabbies’ constitutional rights, seeks a jury trial and damages for the plaintiffs’ missed work time.

"The Constitution prohibits the government from seizing our property without cause and without any sort of process,” said Ken Falk, legal director of the ACLU of Indiana, in a prepared release. “Both of these principles appeared to have been violated in this case."

The suit contends that as many as 80 cab drivers had their licenses seized on May 26. The plaintiffs allege that they had driven clients to the Indianapolis Motor Speedway and agreed to return for them later.

When they did return to the pick-up spots, Speedway police officers seized their operators' licenses and told them to leave the area, the suit says. When the drivers went to the Speedway Police Department to pick up their licenses, they were penalized with parking tickets costing $50.

The suit claims that the actions of the police department violate the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, because seizure of the licenses was not warranted, justified or reasonable, and violated due process.

Trent Theobald, public information officer for the Speedway Police Department, said Monday afternoon that the town had not yet received the suit, and thus could not comment.

Adam Baker, a spokesman for the Indianapolis Department of Code Enforcement, which issues city taxi licenses, Speedway officers do not have authority to seize cab licenses, which can only be revoked by the City of Indianapolis. Baker said there had been a misunderstanding between officers from Indianapolis, who were allowing cabs to turn on a street near thye IMS, and the officers from Speedway, who were not.

Baker said officials from Indianapolis and Speedway will make sure the taxi drop-off and pickup area is clearly designated before NASCAR's Brickyard 400 race on July 28.

"It won't happen again," Baker said.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

  2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

  3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

  4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

  5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).

ADVERTISEMENT