IBJOpinion

SHABAZZ: Thank you for choosing to smoke, or not

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Some of you who hear me on the radio know I make it a point to visit a quaint cigar lounge in downtown Indianapolis. It’s known for its cigars, martinis and good conversation.

Recently, I ran into a couple of gentlemen visiting for a convention. They complimented the city on how friendly the people were, how easy downtown was to negotiate, and the fact there was a place where they could smoke. I asked them about others attending their convention who didn’t smoke and they told me they went to a non-smoking place around the corner. Everyone made a choice and everyone was happy with it. And fundamentally that is what the smoking debate in Indianapolis is all about, responsible adults exercising responsible choices.

Anti-smoking advocates like to push the image of servers forced to work in a smoke-filled bar because they have no choice. Or the image of the patron who orders smoked bacon in a restaurant and it’s the secondhand type that comes with his order. Sorry my friends, in real life the facts tend to lead otherwise.

The current smoking ban compromise was passed in 2005. Smoking is not allowed in most places that allow patrons under 18. Since then, 99 percent of all workplaces in Marion County have gone smoke-free. And two-thirds of the places that serve alcohol are also smoke-free. There is ample choice for consumers, workers and patrons. The compromise is working so well that a survey by Smoke Free Indy, an organization that promotes smoke-free workplaces, shows that more people (81 percent) prefer it over a total ban (71 percent).

Apparently, many people are making the right choice, because with the exception of the activist crowd, this issue was on no one’s radar screen. Mayor Greg Ballard says it never comes up at his town hall meetings. And if you poll most City-County councilors, I’ll bet you a Cohiba that people are more concerned about their neighbor burning leaves than someone burning tobacco leaves in a place they never go.

We all know the dangers of secondhand smoke. We also all know the dangers of eating raw meat and eggs, riding a motorcycle without a helmet, and telling your wife she’s gained weight. But as informed adults, we all make decisions whether to put ourselves at risk. And before critics say that your right to smoke ends when it hits my face, I agree. But I would also maintain that you have a duty not to put yourself at an unnecessary risk when you have a choice to do otherwise. So if you don’t want to come into contact with secondhand smoke, use common sense and stay out of places that allow smoking.

The free market has given us that choice in Indianapolis. Where individuals don’t have a choice—schools, government buildings, hospitals—the government has rightly stepped in. And if anti-smoking forces were serious about protecting individuals with no choice, they would push for laws that would ban smoking in homes where there are children, since children usually don’t get a say about their parents’ behavior. Businesses that allow smoking are clearly labeled for customer and server alike.

It would be one thing if every place in Marion County was a virtual chimney. The compromise that was put in place years ago works just fine. And if you don’t want to join me one day for a cocktail at that cigar lounge downtown, we can walk right around the corner to another place that’s smoke-free.

Ah, the joy of choice!•

__________

Shabazz is morning show host of WXNT-AM 1430, an attorney, and an adjunct professor of speech, political science and business law at the University of Indianapolis and Ivy Tech State College.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Choice I made
    I'll be meeting a friend for a beer tonight. Not wanting to dry clean my suit or offend the sensibilities of my wife upon my return home - I suggested a bar in Indy that is smoke free for our beer. Amazing how the free market system works.
  • Wonderful article!
    What a great article! Governments need to promote Freedom of Choice not just Government's Choice. Thank God our Mayor feels the same way.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT