SHABAZZ: Thank you for choosing to smoke, or not

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Some of you who hear me on the radio know I make it a point to visit a quaint cigar lounge in downtown Indianapolis. It’s known for its cigars, martinis and good conversation.

Recently, I ran into a couple of gentlemen visiting for a convention. They complimented the city on how friendly the people were, how easy downtown was to negotiate, and the fact there was a place where they could smoke. I asked them about others attending their convention who didn’t smoke and they told me they went to a non-smoking place around the corner. Everyone made a choice and everyone was happy with it. And fundamentally that is what the smoking debate in Indianapolis is all about, responsible adults exercising responsible choices.

Anti-smoking advocates like to push the image of servers forced to work in a smoke-filled bar because they have no choice. Or the image of the patron who orders smoked bacon in a restaurant and it’s the secondhand type that comes with his order. Sorry my friends, in real life the facts tend to lead otherwise.

The current smoking ban compromise was passed in 2005. Smoking is not allowed in most places that allow patrons under 18. Since then, 99 percent of all workplaces in Marion County have gone smoke-free. And two-thirds of the places that serve alcohol are also smoke-free. There is ample choice for consumers, workers and patrons. The compromise is working so well that a survey by Smoke Free Indy, an organization that promotes smoke-free workplaces, shows that more people (81 percent) prefer it over a total ban (71 percent).

Apparently, many people are making the right choice, because with the exception of the activist crowd, this issue was on no one’s radar screen. Mayor Greg Ballard says it never comes up at his town hall meetings. And if you poll most City-County councilors, I’ll bet you a Cohiba that people are more concerned about their neighbor burning leaves than someone burning tobacco leaves in a place they never go.

We all know the dangers of secondhand smoke. We also all know the dangers of eating raw meat and eggs, riding a motorcycle without a helmet, and telling your wife she’s gained weight. But as informed adults, we all make decisions whether to put ourselves at risk. And before critics say that your right to smoke ends when it hits my face, I agree. But I would also maintain that you have a duty not to put yourself at an unnecessary risk when you have a choice to do otherwise. So if you don’t want to come into contact with secondhand smoke, use common sense and stay out of places that allow smoking.

The free market has given us that choice in Indianapolis. Where individuals don’t have a choice—schools, government buildings, hospitals—the government has rightly stepped in. And if anti-smoking forces were serious about protecting individuals with no choice, they would push for laws that would ban smoking in homes where there are children, since children usually don’t get a say about their parents’ behavior. Businesses that allow smoking are clearly labeled for customer and server alike.

It would be one thing if every place in Marion County was a virtual chimney. The compromise that was put in place years ago works just fine. And if you don’t want to join me one day for a cocktail at that cigar lounge downtown, we can walk right around the corner to another place that’s smoke-free.

Ah, the joy of choice!•


Shabazz is morning show host of WXNT-AM 1430, an attorney, and an adjunct professor of speech, political science and business law at the University of Indianapolis and Ivy Tech State College.


  • Choice I made
    I'll be meeting a friend for a beer tonight. Not wanting to dry clean my suit or offend the sensibilities of my wife upon my return home - I suggested a bar in Indy that is smoke free for our beer. Amazing how the free market system works.
  • Wonderful article!
    What a great article! Governments need to promote Freedom of Choice not just Government's Choice. Thank God our Mayor feels the same way.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?