IBJNews

Allison Pointe buildings hit with foreclosure suit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Foreclosure proceedings for three buildings in Allison Pointe Park on the city’s northeast side represent the latest twist in a lengthy saga involving the buildings and their complicated ownership structure.

Minneapolis-based U.S. Bank filed to foreclose on the buildings in Marion Superior Court late last month and is seeking a court-appointed receiver to manage them during the foreclosure process.

REW allison point bigpic 15col The Allison Pointe buildings were wrapped up in a complicated master-lease arrangement that.ended with fraud charges from federal prosecutors. (IBJ Photo)

The owners of the buildings, about three dozen entities and individuals, owe $16.6 million, or the entire balance of the loan they received in 2006 to purchase the properties, according to court documents.

The buildings have an ownership structure known as tenants in common, where ownership is divided up among multiple parties. A 2002 change in tax law made those investments particularly attractive in commercial transactions, particularly during the real estate boom.

The complicated deals, which can involve up to 35 investors each, often are used as part of a 1031 exchange. Such exchanges, named for a section of the Internal Revenue Service code, allow investors in revenue-producing real estate to defer taxes if they immediately apply sales proceeds into another property.

But investors in tenants-in-common properties often overpaid for their ownership interests, blinded by their desire to shelter taxable income from the IRS, said Ross Reller, director of land services for Colliers International’s Indiana region.

“You get people motivated by greed who don’t know each other,” he said. “They’re there simply because their accountant or lawyer was helping them shelter taxable gains.”

The three buildings within Allison Pointe, which is at Allisonville Road and Interstate 465, range from 51,000 square feet to 88,000 square feet and were built in the mid-1980s. They are 47-percent to 92-percent occupied, according to Cassidy Turley statistics.

Troubles with the buildings’ ownership surfaced in 2008, when Idaho real estate firm DBSI filed bankruptcy, IBJ reported then. The firm had paid $27 million two years earlier for the three buildings and sold fractional ownership of the office complex to 32 investors scattered across the country.

DBSI signed a master-lease that promised the investors an annual return that would rise each year. The company, in turn, agreed to sublease and manage the properties. Owners of Allison Pointe include investors in California, Utah, Missouri, Hawaii, Minnesota and Nevada, court records show.

Darrin Boyd, a broker at Cassidy Turley, recalled that he and broker Dave Moore were verbally hired by DBSI to list the buildings. But they turned down the opportunity after it became apparent that DBSI operated unlike other building owners, Boyd said.

“It was the only time that I passed on a piece of business that I was awarded,” he said. “They seemed abnormal as an asset manager and an owner, how they wanted to compensate you and how their process worked.”

Even so, Boyd said Allison Pointe is an attractive office park in a good location, now that the new interchange is finished at Interstate 465 and Allisonville Road.

The Allison Pointe deal was part of a nationwide buying binge for DBSI, which amassed a 250-property portfolio worth $2 billion and a staff of hundreds.

But the master leases became unprofitable when rents from tenants failed to generate enough revenue to pay expenses and sustain the guaranteed payments to investors, federal prosecutors allege in an April indictment of DBSI executives.

The four men were indicted in Idaho on charges of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, wire fraud, mail fraud, and interstate transportation of stolen property. They have pleaded not guilty.

Mark Maddox, an Indianapolis securities lawyer at Maddox Hargett & Caruso and former Indiana securities commissioner, has represented clients who feel they got cheated in tenants-in-common ownerships.

“You had too many investors paying too much money at the front end, because the appraisals weren’t accurate,” he said.

In Indianapolis, DBSI also owned an 83,653-square-foot office building at 6666 E. 75th St. near Binford Boulevard and Interstate 465, known as Heritage Park II. The lender filed to foreclose on the building in March 2011.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT