IBJNews

Top senators eye state's sales tax for road needs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lawmakers wrestling with how to pay for road and highway needs amid a growing funding shortfall are considering using money from the state's sales tax on gasoline to pay for transportation projects.

Senate Appropriations Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said the General Assembly should consider guaranteeing some or all of the roughly $500 million the tax generates each year. And Senate Minority Leader Tim Lanane, D-Anderson, said the state should take a modest chunk from that pool to give to cash-strapped areas.

It's a novel concept, lawmakers say.

Kenley, the Senate's lead budget writer, said he has not settled on the move, but is floating it along with other options as the state stares down an annual transportation spending shortfall of roughly $250 million a year. Kenley previously suggested raising the excise fee on license plates, but has backed off.

Indiana has long been able to rely on the $3.8 billion generated from the leasing of the Indiana Toll Road for 75 years, but that money is largely either spent or committed to projects. The problem is compounded by declining gas tax collections — a tax levied in addition to the sales tax on gas — as fuel efficiency improves greatly across all vehicles.

Kenley estimates the state need to find another $100 million a year just for upkeep of existing roads because of the decline in gas tax money and at least another $100 million for localities. Add in the roughly $50 million it would cost each year to finance projects, including the last leg of Interstate 69 and expansions of Interstate 65 and Interstate 70, and the need becomes clear, he said.

"You put that all together, and you've got a big problem that's going to come upon us. And, to me, we need to be ahead of the curve in solving this problem rather than behind it, because road infrastructure is so important in Indiana," Kenley said.

Kenley's push for more transportation money comes as state lawmakers eye a budget and a state surplus that is being pulled in multiple directions: Gov. Mike Pence is standing firm on his call to spend $500 million a year on a cut to the personal income tax. House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, is saying more of that money has to be returned to schools and Democrats are calling for the restoration of $300 million in education cuts made during the recession.

Both Kenley and Lanane praised Pence this week for diverting money that would go to state employee pensions to create a transportation investment fund, calling it a sign that the new governor at least understands the pressing need for road money. But they both are asking for more.

As it stands now, the sales tax on gas goes into the pool of money used to pay for most state services and the money raised by the gas tax is divided among the transportation department, the Indiana State Police and the Bureau of Motor Vehicles. Lanane, who would like to see roughly $50 million from the sales tax used on gas for transportation, noted that most residents would support a logical source of revenue.

"I don't think that Hoosiers have a problem with a tax revenue source that makes sense to them," Lanane said. "Think about it, you're out there, you're buying gasoline to ride on those roads and streets, so this would be a user fee and this would be a logical way to help us catch up and keep the funding there to be adequate."

Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, said Thursday that he was considering diverting the sales tax on gas and House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, said last week that the House budget proposal would find more money for transportation than Pence allocated.

But Kenley cautioned that the four-month session is still young and said he expects more fluidity in the debate, as lawmakers continue to float ideas.

"It seems to me that it's very important for Indiana's economy and for the rest of us consumers who drive I-65 and I-70 to have a better state and local road infrastructure system," he said. "It's a key component of Indiana's — not only businesses — but just the average taxpayer or consumer driving around this state."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I 69 unneeded and $4 Billion... DUH!
    Buried in a mountain of paper called the I-69 study, required by federal law is a simple fact. This over $3 billion dollar Indiana transportation sponge is "The Wabash Erie Canal" again. The study is science. It proves beyond a doubt that it will be an economic failure, trouble is INDOT/ Politics and the Evansville consulting firm would let no fact get in the way. www.i69tour.org
  • roads
    Hey idiots...... use cigarette tax. Like most states do. Stop spending billions to convince people to quit. The more they smoke the more tax Indiana gets.
  • Sales Tax
    I am all in favor of a massive sales tax...make it 20%, 30% whatever. I have the choice to not buy things. Keep groceries sales tax exempt and I am fine with it. Lower property taxes and income taxes as not only a trade off, but a way to encourage investment. I will fight the idea that the state pretends they need more money for roads. We can pay for the ones we have, stop adding lanes and building new monuments to cars and we will be just fine!
  • Taxes
    Cuts that benefit the rich the most, and hikes that hurt everyone else more than the rich. Us regular folk have to spend most of our paychecks on things we need, so we pay a lot of sales tax. The rich only have to spend small amounts from their checks, so they pay proportionally less.
  • Stop Rewarding Special Interests
    Golly gee, Outsider, yes, of course, the state has a $500 million road budget need because of purchases of mileage markers. How are people like you so penny wise and pound foolish? No, the state has transportation funding issues because it chooses to make idiotic transportation expenditures like wasting hundreds of millions of dollars on the grand and never-will-be-finished I-69 highway and building multi-million dollar tunnels under Kentucky to appease the residents of that state and their concerns about the view of what even the federal government says is a dubiously designated "historic" property. The individuals in the General Assembly are not cowards, rather they are easily manipulated bozos who love to spend taxpayers' money playing to big money lobbyists and campaign contributors.
  • Grow one, boys
    Here's a thought. Stop wasting money on things like mileage markers every one hundred feet. That would save billions. Somebody needs to hang for that theft. Yes, I know it's a national theft and President Photoshop is to blame, but for just once, I'd love to see one of those overpaid Gomers at the state capitol stick up for a taxpayer of this state. I'll be long gone to a tropical island before a single one of them grows a spine. Cowards, one and all.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

    2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

    3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

    4. Send them back NOW.

    5. deport now

    ADVERTISEMENT