EDITORIAL: Tough love from taxpayers fed up with school spending

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

Across Indiana, in more than a dozen different school districts over the past year, taxpayers have sent a message to administrators: We are no longer giving you a blank check.

Since last year, when a new state law began requiring public referendums for big expenditures by school corporations, voters have said “no” at least 60 percent of the time in more than 20 special elections requesting tens of millions of dollars.

This phenomenon was on full display Nov. 3, when three local school districts—Beech Grove, Franklin Township and Perry Township—turned to voters for bailouts. Only Beech Grove was successful in convincing voters it deserved the extra help.

There’s no doubt such rejections have created difficult decisions for many school districts, but that is exactly what the new law was supposed to do—force administrators to examine their budgets and start making smarter decisions about spending.

Taxpayers much prefer to live in districts with well-funded and effective schools, so it’s unlikely they’re taking these referendums lightly. Unfortunately, we’re living in a time when people are struggling to make ends meet. And there’s little patience for districts that have repeatedly made boneheaded and wasteful decisions regarding high-salaried superintendents, opulent buildings and overpriced sports facilities.

When Gov. Mitch Daniels began pushing for property-tax reform several years ago, he noted one disturbing fact: Indiana’s school-building projects resulted in construction costs 46 percent higher than the U.S. average.

“We should strengthen taxpayers’ direct say in local decisions,” he said at the time, “especially the borrowing for new schools and other construction, which has been the biggest driver of property-tax increases.”

The idea was to give those most familiar with their districts more control while creating a mind-set among education leaders not to take tax dollars for granted. It’s a tough new reality that’s not going to sink in overnight.

Chances are voters will become a little more forgiving after the economy improves and as administrators show more willingness to be fiscally responsible. District leaders could improve their standing with taxpayers by making fewer threats about teacher cuts and more promises to trim fat from administrative offices.

And the Indiana Legislature could be more helpful in these matters by reviewing a flawed funding formula that provides far fewer dollars on a per-pupil basis to fast-growing districts than it does to those with falling enrollments.

One of those districts, Hamilton Southeastern, is preparing a lawsuit against the state that seeks equitable distribution of pupil funds. In the meantime, the district has its own $38.5 million referendum planned for Nov. 10. It, too, has made some poor financial decisions in the past, and wants a bailout.•


To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

  2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

  3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

  4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

  5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.