IBJNews

Two injured on motorcycle sue Indy over police crash

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two people who were seriously injured when an allegedly intoxicated Indianapolis police officer collided with their stopped motorcycle are seeking unspecified damages from the officer, the police department and the city in at least the third civil suit over the case, including two in the past week.

Kurt Weekly and Mary Mills filed the lawsuit Tuesday in Marion County against former Officer David Bisard and the other defendants, claiming the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department did not adequately oversee Bisard.

"It was foreseeable and substantially certain to the Defendants the City of Indianapolis and IMPD that its failure to properly train, supervise and monitor IMPD Officer David Bisard would cause a collision resulting in serious injuries and/or death or would expose the public including Kurt Weekly to such risk," the lawsuit said.

After the Aug. 6, 2010, crash at an Indianapolis intersection, blood work showed Bisard had a blood-alcohol content of 0.19 — more than twice the legal limit for drivers — when he drove his squad car into two motorcycles stopped for a traffic light. A judge earlier this year threw out the blood test in the criminal case against Bisard because it wasn't performed according to state law.

The collision killed 30-year-old Eric Wells, and his family sued the city in December, claiming Bisard was negligent.

Weekly says he suffered a brain injury, incurred more than $500,000 in medical expenses and has lost wages as a result of the collision. Mills, who was riding on Weekly's motorcycle, also is seeking damages for medical bills and lost wages.

Weekly and Mills, who recently married, also claim they experienced emotion pain from witnessing "the gruesome death" of Wells, their friend and co-worker, and each other's suffering.

Indiana tort law caps the city's liability at $700,000 per claim.

Bisard's attorney, John Kautzman, said he had no immediate comment on the lawsuit. City attorney Samantha Karn said it does not comment on pending litigation.

A third lawsuit was filed last week by three formerly high-ranking Indianapolis police officers. They are suing the city for damages and lost wages after being demoted for how they handled the crash. Former Assistant Chief Darryl Pierce, reduced with the others last year to the rank of lieutenant, said the three were made scapegoats.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • protect and serve
    Shame on the city of Indianapolis for not doing what was RIGHT in the first place! ,Protecting an Officer who broke the law killing someone,injurying others! Its a no brainer they should have to pay! especialy if you keep persons like that on the payroll you should be LIABLE!
  • crash and scape goats
    I totally agree with Pierce.. Someone higher up than the ones demoted is hiding something maybe hiding alot!! So we need to support the ones demoted and they need to dig deeper like from Straub;Ballard and the mysterious man???

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.

ADVERTISEMENT